Isabel Hardman
Already a subscriber? Log in
He added:
‘Congress, it’s right to celebrate the Olympics, but it’s even more important to learn from them. For the central lessons of this summer – that private isn’t always best and the market doesn’t always deliver – surely need to shape future policy.’
Boris Johnson made the most effective Olympics analogy earlier this summer, when he used Usain Bolt to explain why competition was a good thing for standards. Barber and his colleagues are right to be suspicious of the set up that led to G4S securing and then fluffing the Games security contract: there wasn’t any competition to make the firm put in a Bolt-esque performance. Had they been in competition with the military and other big security firms rather than running what is effectively a monopoly in the private sector, they might have proven themselves, or at least might not have won that contract in the first place.
Private isn’t better than public if it behaves in the same way as a state monopoly does, without regard to competitors snapping at its heels. Tories surveying the fiasco as it unfolded remarked that it showed that strong scrutiny and proper competition for contracts are essential. Philip Hammond acknowledged as much in an interview in August, when he said he had reconsidered his view of the private sector following the G4S debacle. It must be one of the first times that Barber finds himself in agreement with someone of the defence secretary’s persuasion.
Because you read about trade unions
Also by Isabel Hardman
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in