James Delingpole
Already a subscriber? Log in
When, though, was the last time you saw Simon Heffer presenting a red-meat documentary on the scrounging underclass; or Allister Heath doing a brutal takedown of QE; or Paul ‘Guido Fawkes’ Staines investigating the tangled ‘green’ business interests of Tim Yeo MP and Lord Deben; or me, doing an exposé of Big Wind?
You didn’t and you likely never will. TV’s relentlessly green/left-liberal agenda just wouldn’t allow it. When was the last time you saw a TV programme expressing proper scepticism about the great Climate Change Scare. The answer, I can tell you, was five years ago, with Martin Durkin’s The Great Global Warming Swindle. Since then: nothing.
To understand why, you really should read Durkin’s fascinating recent blogpost www.martindurkin.com (snappily titled ‘Kiss Goodbye to James Delingpole’). If you think press censorship is bad, he argues, wait till you see what programme-makers have to put up with under the tyranny of Ofcom. Any programme that dares to defy the bien-pensant orthodoxy is likely to result in a flood of complaints, an Ofcom adjudication, then career-death for all involved.
It would be nice to think this process would work both ways: that after, say, Channel 4 broadcast a ‘documentary’ as egregiously lame and fat-headed as Is Our Weather Getting Worse? there’d be so many viewer complaints that the entire programme-making team would end up with their heads on spikes at Tower Bridge.
Unfortunately not. Provided you’re on the politically correct side of the argument, any amount of bias is apparently forgivable in the broadcast media. As Durkin notes: ‘On the BBC’s Today programme politicians are regularly berated for not doing enough about this or that, or for threatening worthy projects with their cuts. How many times, in the past ten years, have you heard the Statist BBC reporters asking about the shocking levels of debt? Or demanding of politicians with new proposals: “Who’s paying for all this? Where’s all the money coming from?” Where is the balance here?’
Where indeed? A few months ago, I was invited by a publicist to review a documentary of which the BBC was clearly very proud, called You’ve Been Trumped, about Donald Trump’s plans to build a £1 billion golf course near Aberdeen. The documentary — it almost goes without saying — was agin the project, focusing on the objections of three local families and the damage that would be done to the protected sand dunes.
Now I don’t doubt the sincerity of the film-maker. But in the context of what Alex Salmond has been doing to Scotland with his massive wind-farm building programme these past few years, the BBC’s decision to commission such a piece seems perverse to the point of obscenity. Whatever you may think of Trump — and I appreciate he makes a great pantomime villain — the fact remains that what he is planning will bring jobs, tourism, pleasure and prosperity to the region, work more or less sympathetically with the landscape, and is supported by the vast majority of local people. Salmond’s grand project, on the other hand, represents probably the most savage act of destruction against Scotland since the days of the ‘Butcher’ Cumberland.
Can the BBC really not see this? It has made the equivalent of a documentary about the devastation wrought on the barnacle and limpet population by landing craft on Normandy’s beaches in June 1944, and it’s really first class, with lots of amazing re-
creations of what it must have been like to be a mollusc when the invasion fleet appeared. But it’s not the main story; not the one people have a right to expect in return for their compulsory licence fee. Plus ça change.
Also in Arts Reviews
Also by James Delingpole
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in