Dan Jones

The long and the short of it

The Hundred Years War III: Divided Houses, by Jonathan Sumption

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

This was a strange period of what Sumption calls ‘intense personal heroism and collective mediocrity’. There were no thumping great battles to match Crécy, Poitiers or Agincourt. City sieges and raiding tactics came to the fore. The pursuit of war passed into the hands of professional soldiers and the routiers freelance companies such as that commanded by the famous Englishman Sir John Hawkwood. The French built up their naval strength and harrassed the English coastline and shipping. The English developed the tactic of the chevauchée: a mounted campaign of terror through the French countryside, which took a greater toll on the ordinary folk, slaughtered and left destitute, than it did on the heart of enemy government.

In the late 1370s England was destabilised by the deaths of Edward III and his most competent son, Edward the Black Prince. English war aims were then further skewed by the vaunting ambition of another royal prince, John of Gaunt, to make himself King of Castile. The new king — Richard II — turned out to be a weak child and a bullying, paranoid adult who fell out with his family and isolated the Crown from the political nation. Rebellion in Ireland and trouble in the Scottish borders distracted from the push to re-conquer Aquitaine and Brittany. War finance became the most pressing and insoluble issue of the day, but the King was inadequate to the task of resolving it. Peasants, parliaments and peers all expressed their disgruntlement with Richard’s disastrous leadership throughout his reign until he was finally deposed.

Sumption describes in vivid but measured prose the schism and discord across Europe. The papacy split between Avignon and Rome in 1378. It was subsequently dead as a peacemaking institution. The leading families of Navarre, Castile and Aragon squabbled incessantly. When Charles VI of France went mad in 1392, his powerful uncles — the dukes of Burgundy and Berry — began fighting among themselves and destabilised their own Crown.

By 1399, it was England that had most obviously hit the skids. An exhausted peace had been struck, but English possessions had dwindled to small coastal strips around Calais and Bordeaux. Yet France had problems of her own. The population was sick of suffering rapine and plunder. Royal authority was dangerously weak under a king who was convinced that he was made entirely from glass. Though neither side knew it, Agincourt was not far away. That, however, is for another volume.

Despite its many peculiar and violent turns, Sumption tells us the story straight. His skill throughout all three volumes so far has been to treat the conflict as a civil war between kingdoms that were intimately connected by blood, culture and history. The European context — lacking in many studies of this period — is at the heart of his work. The action shifts seamlessly from the Scottish marches to the plains of Navarre and the papal states and captures the experience of ceaseless, vicious war at every level of society.

In its breadth, political acumen and adherence to the art of simple storytelling, this is History with a capital H. Back in the 18th and 19th centuries, Sumption would have been in good company. But there’s no getting away from the fact that this volume alone is a 1,006-page account of a mere 30-year interim between more exciting episodes in a distant war. It’s the sort of commercial nightmare that no mainstream publisher except for Faber would consider. I have no idea how, even at £40 a pop, it will be possible for anyone to turn a buck on this book.

Yet these are vulgar thoughts. What Sumption is producing is a monumental and complete work. When this history is finished, there will be no need of another for at least a generation. Everyone else may as well pack up.

The only question that remains is when he will get around to finishing his masterpiece. Volume I appeared in 1990. It is now out of print, though you can buy it on Amazon and eBay. Volume II came out in 1997. Sumption had better get his skates on. At the rate he’s going there will have to be five or, like Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, six volumes. He has a busy day-job, but at this rate we won’t see his brilliant story completed until some time in the 2030s.

Then again, that may not be a bad thing. Even Sumption’s youngest readers will, by then, be wondering what on earth to do during their impending retirement. Well, here’s the answer.

Dan Jones’s Summer of Blood: The Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 will be published on 30 April (Harper Press, £20).

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in