William Brett

Giving the boy a bad review

William Brett reviews Juan Gabriel Vásquez’s new novel

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Colombia certainly qualifies as a country riven by catastrophe. Its post-war politics have been consistently unstable, and ‘narco-guerrillas’, powerful militants grown fat on drug money, are still waging a form of civil war with an increasingly heavy-handed state. The Informers looks at Colombia’s less familiar wartime history, in which many Colombian Germans, accused by the US (rightly or wrongly) of harbouring Nazi sympathies, were ‘blacklisted’, and as a result suffered what Vásquez calls ‘a sort of civil death’. The novel centres on a father-son relationship, in which the father (professor of rhetoric, honoured citizen) publishes a damning review of a book by his son (inquisitive journalist) about the life of a German family friend during the war. In fact, the father had been hiding a shameful secret about his own wartime conduct, and was worried that his son’s book would expose him. Eventually, the son pieces together the events of the past, but the implications of these events become a cross too heavy to bear.

It’s not just the war that weighs heavy on the hearts of the characters in this novel — more recent troubles play their part in forcing painful historical events into the realm of the everyday. One character, the father’s lover, is traumatised by the memory of her family being wiped out by a bomb in Bogotá in the Eighties. For Colombians, the continuity of violence forces the past to intrude constantly on the present. Under these conditions, the idea that ‘one pays for what one’s ancestors have done’ doesn’t seem so archaic. This isn’t Greek tragedy; this is modern tragedy.

At times the novel reads like an existential text. Its concern with the tension between word and deed (the father’s interest in rhetoric is reflected in the novel’s obsession with the spoken word) eventually explodes into a realisation that word is deed. The informers of the title do a great deal just by speaking; the son’s persistent verbal enquiries, and the words that he extracts from his sources, have the power to change lives utterly. The reality of cause and effect — the fact that by speaking or doing, we prove our existence — forms a consolatory philosophical centre to an otherwise bleak narrative.

Vásquez handles this electric material efficiently and with some panache. Colombian writers must inevitably work in the shadow of the master, Gabriel Garcia Marquez. But with this thrilling effort, Vásquez goes some way towards taking up the torch.

On the night before the Battle of Cold Harbor in 1864, many of the Federal soldiers wrote their names on slips of paper they pinned to their backs so their families could be informed of their deaths. One made a last diary entry, the line which is reproduced here.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in