Kate Grimond

A fickle jade

Kate Grimond on her father, Strix, former columnist of <span style="font-style: italic;">The Spectator </span>

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

‘Fame is a fickle jade,’ he wrote in an early piece about some new plays about writers, ‘and the author who entrusts his posthumous reputation to his works alone cannot be confident that he will escape neglect, for he who aims at the tastes of posterity draws a bow at a venture.’

‘Ordeal by Holiday’, from the Thirties, would come under a plus ça change tag.

The Holiday Spirit to … which so many references are made at certain times of year in the columns of newspapers, is something very different from the ‘free and holiday-rejoicing spirit’ of which Lamb once wrote . . . Whether he is advancing with all the abandon of a pebble in a glacier, in what the Americans — aptly enough — call a ‘traffic snarl’ seven miles long, or whether he is shuffling in a disgruntled procession to have his passport inspected, and wondering why his rulers call him a world-citizen when they clearly regard him as an international crook — in whatever form the Englishman is tasting the sweets of freedom and leisure, the Holiday Spirit of today can have no softening effect on his character.

On the flimsiness of theatre programmes:

Alas for the modern fashion in playbills! One hundred, two hundred years ago it would have been ‘Mrs Scott (friend to Lucy)’ or ‘Mrs Scott (a creature of the Duke’s)’ or even more categorically ‘Mrs Scott (a comical old fishwife, conceiving herself to be in love with Charles)’. Today you find none of these aids to memory. The name Mrs Scott suggests nothing. She may have been the hero’s mistress or his Member of Parliament: she may have been a governess or a go-between; she may have been all four.

There often lurked in his writing a parodic hinterland of stylised Victorian life, Edward- ian house parties, ‘gadzooks’ lingo.

Fleming’s travel books, in particular Brazilian Adventure (1933) and News from Tartary (1936), loaded with understatement and wry humour, epitomised the genre of 1930s’ travel writing. ‘Hitherto’, he wrote later, ‘travel-writers had been travellers first, writers second; but now manner became as important as matter, and sometimes more so,’ and in this he was something of a pioneer.

The first of these journeys — again with time off from the obliging Spectator — was to the Amazon to search for Colonel Fawcett, who had gone missing there seven years earlier. The trip failed in its purpose but succeeded in making Fleming a bestselling young author. Brazilian Adventure was greeted with enthusiasm by distinguished writers of the day. Evelyn Waugh, while full of praise (‘I am putting it in the highest class’), did criticise the self-consciousness of the writer.

News from Tartary, the account of an arduous seven-month journey that he made by foot, by pony and by camel with a formidable young Swiss woman, Ella Maillart, from China to Kashmir, brought further celebrity. It was a journey of 3,500 miles over remote and harsh land in which the final innings of the Great Game were being played. Noting that Fleming’s ‘own stylistic capacity makes him blush’, Harold Nicolson wondered whether he would ever shed his self- consciousness and ‘allow his love of writing to triumph’. Perhaps he never fully did.

He went on contributing to The Spectator, producing hundreds of fourth leaders (those light addenda to the leader page) for the Times, and writing books on historical incidents in countries through which he had travelled — The Siege at Peking, Bayonets to Lhasa — as well as an enjoyable early account of the preparations in place in 1940 for a German invasion.

In 1964, his birthday was omitted from the daily list in the Times. He claimed, in ‘Down a Peg’, that he had regarded his appearance on it with indifference.

My disappearance from it, however, is another matter. One knew … that one was going steadily downhill, losing one’s grip, getting dimmer and dimmer … one recognised the necessity for culling the top birthday folk …. One faced the situation, in fact, with a steady eye and a stiff upper lip. All the same .…

He finally laid down his pen for The Spectator at the end of the Sixties, being wilfully out of touch with that off-beat decade. One of his very first articles had been about duck flighting in South China; one of his last began, ‘I propose to write this week about game books.’ This may have been the last straw for the edit or of the time.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in