The Spectator

The Leader | 12 March 2005

The most remarkable thing about the IRA’s statement is that anyone should express surprise

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Almost as if to compensate for its failure to tackle the continued rule of terror by the IRA, the government has instead hyped up the threat from Muslim terrorists. This magazine opposes strenuously the Prevention of Terrorism Bill, which would suspend habeas corpus and allow terrorist suspects to be held under house arrest without trial. But if the Home Secretary Charles Clarke does manage to get the Bill on to the statute book, we hope that for the sake of consistency he will exercise the powers not merely against the 200 Muslim terrorists he says are plotting attacks against Britain, but also against a good proportion of the membership of Sinn Fein and the IRA. He will have no excuse not to: section 2 (1) of the Bill clearly states that the powers can be used against any individual who ‘is or has been involved in terrorism-related activities’ in cases where the director of public prosecutions has advised ‘there is no reasonable prospect of a successful prosecution of the individual for terrorism-related activity’. That description fits the killers of Robert McCartney perfectly. For the Home Secretary to exercise the powers of the Prevention of Terrorism Bill against suspected Muslim terrorists but to refuse to do so against Irish terrorists would be pure racism.

We would far rather, of course, that Mr McCartney’s killers be brought to justice properly, through the courts. This would more likely be achieved were the government to support the growing revolt against the IRA by ordinary republicans. It could achieve this by ceasing to appease the terrorists. The effect of the peace process has been to sideline moderate republican political parties in favour of Sinn Fein. It is with them that all the deals have been done, them for whom the power-sharing arrangements have been made; Sinn Fein has been treated as if it were the sole representative of all Catholics in Northern Ireland. Nothing will change Mr Blair’s starry-eyed view of Gerry Adams and his henchmen: not even December’s £26 million bank robbery in which the IRA was implicated. What has been the government’s reaction to this? To suspend the parliamentary expenses paid to Sinn Fein MPs in spite of their non-attendance at Westminster.

Moreover, in spite of suspending the Northern Ireland Assembly and Executive in 2002, and in spite of the mass protest of parents, the Northern Ireland Office continues to carry out the abolition of grammar schools begun by Martin McGuinness during his spell as Northern Ireland’s education minister.

Mr Blair’s approach to Sinn Fein has sadly been copied by the Bush administration. In response to December’s bank robbery and the killing of Mr McCartney, President Bush has disinvited Gerry Adams from the White House on St Patrick’s Day. Yet, so as not to offend Sinn Fein, other Irish republican parties have been disinvited too: effectively punished for the crimes of the IRA. It is an outrage that politicians committed to democracy and the rule of law should be treated in this fashion. Catholics repressed by the IRA for decades are finally summoning the courage to turn against the fascist bully boys who have marred their lives for so long. It is about time our government, and that of America, had the guts to support them.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in