The Spectator

Outsource those jobs

Outsource those jobs

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Just as outsourcing is good for America, so it is for Britain. Here, outsourcing has been increasing at such a rate that Digby Jones, director-general of the CBI, this week predicted that in 10 years’ time there would not be a single job for an unskilled worker in Britain. According to the strictures of Kerrynomics, Britain is heading for a dark future of closed factories, abandoned farmsteads and miserable wretches straight from the pages of The Grapes of Wrath, scratching around for scraps of food and falling pathetically for the cold and calculated charity of the Ku Klux Klan. Yet exactly the opposite has happened. Unemployment has fallen to the lowest level for more than a generation: in fact when you subtract the temporarily unemployed who are spending a few weeks between jobs, and the truly unemployable who simply do not wish to work, unemployment is negligible.

How come, when, as the unions keep moaning, all these jobs are being sucked away to Bombay? When protectionists raise the spectre of job losses, they are only drawing our attention to one half of the ledger. What they don’t say is that for every job moved to India, one and a bit jobs have been created in Britain. As has been noted in these pages before, the erroneous belief of the protectionists is that jobs are in finite supply. They are not. There are as many jobs in the world as the market is allowed to create.

A similarly one-sided analysis is presented by those who protest against the migration of workers to Britain. We are forever being drawn to the spectre of foreigners coming to take our jobs, steal our women and cause south-east England to be concreted over with little houses. Yet how often does the anti-immigration lobby draw attention to the other side of the ledger: emigration? In the past year, the Office of National Statistics announced last week, a record 191,000 Britons left the country either to take up jobs abroad or to retire there. With the number of immigrants falling and the number of emigrants rising, it may well be that Britain will soon be experiencing a net outflow of its population: a situation which existed as recently as 1993.

Anyone who fears Britain is becoming a hell-hole of housing estates and mini-roundabouts is quite welcome to join the exodus, and set up home in Andalusia or Florida. Rather than fear the phenomenon of international migration, why not take advantage of it? Rather than moan about the outsourcing of jobs to India, why don’t those miserable trade union protectionists follow their jobs out to India and the Far East? They might not earn so much, but the weather will be better and the food cheaper.

It is all too easy for politicians to sell fear, to pile up a few votes by appealing to base instincts of xenophobia. But the people aren’t stupid. They can see that globalisation presents more opportunities than it does problems. Ultimately, it is about the freedom to choose what we want to buy, how we want to work and where we want to live. The voters of Ohio could see that, and in rejecting John Kerry they inflicted upon economic isolationism an important defeat.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in