Paul Johnson

Splendours and miseries of the man on the alabaster elephant

Splendours and miseries of the man on the alabaster elephant

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

An even greater treasure of mine was an alabaster elephant which I think was done in India in about 1903, at the time of the durbar held to mark the coronation of Edward VII as King-Emperor. It was a fine ceremonial elephant, painted green, red and grey, though most of the colour had gone. On its broad back was a flat surface, bound to its sides by broad straps, and on this surface once rested a howdah, containing the figure of Lord Curzon, Viceroy of India 1898–1905. Alas, howdah and viceroy had long since been swept into oblivion; and, about ten years ago, during a cleaning process or one of those periodic catastrophes which take over a peaceful household, like the harrowings in a Bosch triptych, my elephant was swept violently to the floor and shattered beyond repair.

I had almost forgotten about him when, the other day, wishing to look up something, I consulted David Dilks’s two-volume book Curzon in India, and next to it on the shelf found another volume by Leonard Mosley, called Curzon: End of an Epoch, which I remember reviewing. Lo! Opposite page 49 is a photograph with a caption: ‘Viceroy and Vicereine arriving for the Durbar.’ And there is a ceremonial elephant, complete with howdah, and Lord and Lady Curzon on it. Words cannot describe the magnificence of this beast and its burden. To begin with, the elephant is truly colossal, specially chosen or bred for an event of the greatest splendour. It must have been about 18 feet high and big in proportion, making my alabaster elephant seem puny. Its trunk, not curled like mine’s was, is held out stiff, straight and vertical, the tip just touching the ground. It has a fringed and jewelled band above its head, and its eyes, face and much of its front are elaborately painted. There are magnificent fringes, too, of silk I think, hanging down its trunk and on either side of its noble skull. Covering most of its body is a colossal Persian carpet, reaching almost to the ground, and on top of it is a big fringed rug, plus cushions, to constitute a soft plinth for the howdah. This is a great gondola-like piece of furniture, painted in white and gold (I imagine: the photo is monochrome) with pinnacles at each corner surmounted by crowns, and the royal coat of arms decorating the sides. In it is an apprehensive-looking Curzon and a positively nervous Vicereine, and I don’t blame her for being frightened; she must have been a good 20 feet above the ground, and who was to know what would happen if the beast broke into a trot? (Its front legs were loosely chained together to prevent this happening.) The magnificently bearded and turbaned mahout, with gold braid over the chest of his dark blue uniform, sits in charge, clutching a golden rein. Over the howdah stands a similar figure, holding an immense silk and fringed parasol, which brings the height of this tottering and swaying ensemble to nearly 30 feet. By the elephant’s right leg stands a very fierce-looking guard, wielding a ten-foot spear, and I imagine there were three others at the corners, outside the photo. All in all the plate brilliantly perpetuates an epiphany of imperialism at its most splendidly barbaric, oriental magnificence precariously presided over by a polished product of Eton and Balliol in their golden age. One could write a book about it.

Indeed one could, for it also epitomises the transience, fragility and frustrations of imperial grandeur, and its ultimate futility. The durbar itself caused Curzon immense trouble, irritation and even humiliation. He had been obliged to discipline a fashionable hussar regiment for killing a native unnecessarily. Indeed he had wished to exclude it from the durbar parade, but had been persuaded otherwise. When the 7th Hussars rode past, in arrogant, clinking glitter, the vast Anglo-Indian crowd burst into a frenzy of cheering, while Curzon, taking the salute — on a horse this time — sat stonily silent. He was already quarrelling with the home government, as well as with his army commander, Herbert Kitchener, and the two of them eventually produced his enforced resignation and return to London under a cloud. Curzon had been the youngest viceroy, and as his enemy Lord Beaverbrook wrote, ‘For the rest of his life Curzon was influenced by his sudden journey to heaven at the age of 39, and then by his return seven years later to earth, for the remainder of his mortal existence.’

Why Beaverbrook hated Curzon so much I have never discovered, but he went to the trouble and expense of buying up the Curzon papers so they could be used by his underlings to blacken the poor man’s reputation. One of these efforts was the Mosley biography, an exercise in ridicule. I gave it a stinging review, pointing out Curzon’s real qualities and achievements. I subsequently received a grateful letter, signed ‘Ravensdale’. This turned out to be from a woman, not a man. Curzon had no son, and by special permission of King George V one of his titles, the barony of Ravensdale, passed to his eldest daughter, Irene. Curzon had three daughters. One married the notorious Oswald Mosley, who later seduced the other two, including my correspondent. There is an effigy of Curzon in the church at his ancestral home, Kedleston. Not in alabaster, though.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in