Bob Alexander

No hanging chads, please

Bob Alexander on the need to reform the voting system to get rid of ‘electoral bias’

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

What is disappointing is that the Conservatives have resisted any form of change. They seem to take the robust but brain-dead view that the same system gave them a long spell in power and that their turn will come again. In a recent House of Lords debate which attracted a total of just six speakers, the Conservative front-bench spokesman expressed the Panglossian view that all was well. So did the government. The present system suits it down to the ground.

But now a crack is appearing in the iceberg. Michael Howard has rightly adopted the concerns of the Jenkins report about the illogicality of Scottish MPs voting on purely English issues when they cannot vote on the same issues for Scotland and nor can English MPs. This is at last coming to matter on close issues such as foundation hospitals and tuition fees. Add to this the anomaly that Scotland is greatly over-represented in Parliament per head of population, a fact which the government has acknowledged by saying it would reduce the number. But it has retreated from this too.

Yet the real canker at the heart of the voting system is what is known in the jargon as ‘electoral bias’. What this means is that overall the number of voters in Labour-held constituencies is far lower than that in Conservative seats. This has developed gradually with population shifts, but it has now become starkly anomalous. It could blight Michael Howard’s dynamic and skilful efforts to revitalise Conservative support.

Take two examples. To get 224 seats at the next election, the Conservatives would need 37.5 per cent of the vote. Should Labour get the same percentage, it would win 364 seats and have an overall majority of about 70. The Conservatives would not gain an overall majority of even one seat without an 11.5 per cent lead over Labour. How long would voters tolerate such a plainly unfair outcome?

There are other wider concerns about the current system — not least that about 400 constituencies never change hands, which means that some voters may spend all their life backing a party but never contribute to electing a single MP. Perhaps it is not surprising that the turnout was down to 61 per cent last time.

But now that the Conservatives have begun to challenge the unfairness to English voters of the Scottish position, perhaps the iceberg will crack again and they will tackle the even more pressing problem of electoral bias before it produces ever more glaring injustice. The reaction to a Conservative majority of 5 per cent in the polls but a significant overall Labour majority in Parliament can be foreseen now. The people will be short-changed, the government will lack authority, and there will be no democratic legitimacy to its decisions. The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats should screech the problem from the rooftops now. Otherwise at some election soon it could come to make hanging chads in Florida look like a storm in a vicarage teacup.

Lord Alexander of Weedon QC was a member of the Jenkins Commission on the Voting System.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in