Isabel Hardman Isabel Hardman

Finally, some justice for the infected blood scandal’s victims

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Contaminated blood was far worse in terms of scale and government culpability than much better-known scandals such as thalidomide. The stories of lives ruined or lost, and families stigmatised to the extent they had to leave their communities because their desperately ill children were no longer welcome in the local school, are hard for anyone to hear. Lee Turton, for instance, was diagnosed with haemophilia shortly after his birth in 1981. His parents found out four years later that the blood products meant to help manage his condition had infected him with HIV. It was only after his death in 1992 that they also discovered he had been infected with Hepatitis C. His short life became increasingly painful and isolated. A teacher at his school said they would refuse to have him in their class. Parents at the school expressed similar fears and refused to invite Lee to their children’s birthday parties, so the Turtons moved to Cornwall where no one would know their son’s diagnosis. In 2019, as she gave evidence to the Infected Blood Inquiry, his mother Denise watched for the first time a video of her dying son’s final Christmas. Previously she had found the prospect of watching the footage of her emaciated son barely able to acknowledge his parents too distressing. It is hard for anyone to view that video, let alone those who actually knew the jovial little boy. 

With stories like Lee’s – and there are between 5,000 and 30,000 people affected by this scandal – it is hard to understand why it has taken so long for there to be anything like proper compensation, let alone the public inquiry that so many families hope will finally bring a form of justice. The answer that Diana Johnson, a Labour MP who has campaigned for years on this, eventually reached was that the government and health service ignored these patients for one simple reason: they could. Ministers who came into the Department for Health were repeatedly fobbed off with a ‘nothing to see here’ line. It shouldn’t have taken 40 years for there to be an answer for what happened to thousands of patients who trusted their health service and the treatments it was giving them. The old saying that power corrupts may well be true, but what it far more commonly does is remove accountability.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in