Ian Acheson Ian Acheson

We must do more to protect our MPs

Flowers are laid for Sir David Amess outside Belfairs Methodist Church, Leigh-on-Sea (photo: Getty)

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

But MPs and their support staff should not have to live with the threat of being murdered in the course of their duties. Many of them will be feeling frightened and vulnerable this morning and asking why such an outrage has happened again. The police must have an assertive role in making sure that open, accessible democracy continues with MPs and their staff in the community protected to the fullest extent possible from those whose greatest ambition would be its destruction.

Back in 2016, following the murder of Jo Cox by an extreme right-wing terrorist, I was surprised to learn that the protection of MPs was partly co-ordinated by Ipsa, the independent parliamentary standards regulator better known for questioning expense receipts. In 2016, the Met Deputy Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu wrote to all Chief Constables reminding them of their obligations in respect of ‘Operation Bridger’ – a national initiative to improve MPs’ protection, which cited ‘real anxiety and a low level of confidence that the authorities are addressing their protection.’ The language in this letter is striking. It is essentially a begging letter, pleading with all 43 Chief Constables to better support MPs, some of whom had expressed ‘low confidence’ in the policing response.

What also emerges from this missive is the complex stew of local, national and parliamentary agencies and units engaged in risk management. While there may have been improvements in the interim, it does not sound like a protection regime designed to inspire confidence or act with executive efficiency. When the grief and anger dies down, this is an initiative that must require robust independent scrutiny. As I have written before for Coffee House, we have far too poor a track record in Heath-Robinson style threat management in this country to be remotely complacent.

Representative democracy is anathema to theocratic fascists and other extremists the world over. There’s something unique and precious about our system where politicians leave a gilded palace at the end of the week and fan out across this nation to church halls, rooms above pubs and school classrooms to meet ordinary people and help solve their problems. Whatever the cost, this system must be preserved – but that cost can’t be paid for with any more blood. Sir David Amess stoutly defended that open, accessible process. Honouring his life and service requires the full might of the state to keep it going.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in