Lloyd Evans Lloyd Evans

Angela Rayner’s PMQs performance wasn’t a triumph

(Photo: UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor)

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

She sought to humiliate Raab by reminding us that he was on a luxury holiday when the Afghan crisis erupted last month. So she set him a little arithmetic test. How many hours would the average Brit have to work to fund a single night at his five-star digs in Crete? Raab smiled at this effort. Too clever. Too convoluted. Too wordy. At PMQs, the swiftest weapons leave the deepest scars.

He murmured a forgettable reply about the Tories offering free childcare and boosting the value of the national living wage. He added that the economy always nosedives under Labour. Dull, droning answers. Just the ticket.

Then it was Rayner’s turn again. Lights! Camera! Angela! Each time she stood up she smirked and caught her opponent’s eye. And he started to mirror her movements, giggling and chuckling, and responding to her glances with twinkly, suggestive looks. The pair seemed to be enjoying some unseen joke at everyone else’s expense.

She made a predictable quip about the ‘hot air shortage’ being amply covered by Boris. And she raised the recent story that Raab had ‘complained about sharing a 115-room tax-payer-funded mansion with the Foreign Secretary.’

This was a reference to Chevening, the grace-and-favour estate once occupied by the croquet-loving John Prescott. The gag exploded in her face.

‘She should check her facts,’ said Raab icily. ‘Chevening is run by a charity and doesn’t use a penny of taxpayers’ money.’

Rayner probably imagines that she scored a triumph today. Her fan club will doubtless be celebrating a great victory this afternoon. But what has she achieved, apart from reminding everyone that she can seem over-dressed on occasion? She was wrong-footed by a simple error that her researchers should have spotted. And she caused Raab no real difficulty because she was having too much fun lobbing her carefully crafted gotcha questions at him.

Raab survived the encounter well enough. But only because TV got the better of Rayner.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in