Already a subscriber? Log in
Chislehurst, Kent
Sir: Douglas Murray contends that we are entering a ‘Boring Twenties’ of endless pings and vaccines and that this is not going to be a party decade (‘Get ready for the Boring Twenties’, 24 July). Whatever the travails this decade has in store for us, I should like to temper his pessimism by assuring him that those of us in the younger generation with a taste for such things have been attending parties with great panache and style. Can I also point out to him that the quiet emergence of illegal ‘speakeasy’ events during the European lockdowns echoes prohibition-era America? And that many young men in the towns have been central-parting, cropping and coiffing their hairstyles? And that, though the 1920s will never be repeated, we are once again living with rapidly changing technologies and economic realities? Uncertainty lies ahead. Meanwhile, Mr Murray is most welcome to join the party, for as long as it lasts.
R.D. Stevenson
Oxford
Sir: Having just returned from six months in South Africa, I think Andrew Kenny’s analysis is spot on (‘Letter from South Africa’, 31 July). The country needs a bold new vision for education and opportunity. The basis for the former exists and the latter should be fostered by massive public works, new cities, houses for all and no more shacks, rebuilding the railways, embracing solar power. This, along with a trenchant eradication of corruption, would start a journey towards becoming the first-world country South Africa deserves to be.
David Potter
Donnington, Newbury
Sir: Surely the National Trust could have made a bomb by promoting Orford Ness as England’s Area 51 (Arts, 31 July)? I’m sure that conspiracy theorists, sci-fi nerds and schoolboys of all ages would have flocked to the place if a little thought had been given to advertising its secret history. Instead there is a ‘wellness walk’, art installations and poetry pumped into your ears when you visit the place. The National Trust, I’m sorry to say, is no longer fit for purpose.
John Paddison
Dumfries, Dumfries and Galloway
Sir: In his ‘Ancient and modern’ column Peter Jones refers to Baron de Coubertin having ‘admired the spirit of games on the playing fields of Eton’ (24 July). He may well have done so, but his real inspiration in dreaming up the modern Olympics came from his visits to Rugby, where de Coubertin expressed huge admiration for the school’s former head, Dr Arnold. In 2012, at the time of the London Olympics, Lord Coe (Chair of the IOC) unveiled a plaque at Rugby School signifying its role as the birthplace of the modern Olympics.
De Coubertin may have been a little misguided in his admiration for Arnold, who was not a lover of sport, seeing it as a diversion from poaching and fighting. More likely De Coubertin’s ideas were influenced by his reading of Tom Brown’s Schooldays, which portrays a more sporting Arnold. Either way, the modern Olympics have their origins on the playing fields of Rugby, not Eton.
Ian David
Newton, Rugby
Sir: The Spectator has been a lifeline to me during the pandemic. I read everything, often back to front. Dot Wordsworth’s pieces are little gems. But please point out that Winifred Holtby was Shirley Willams’s adoptive aunt, not her mother (Mind your language, 31 July). Baroness Williams’s mother was Vera Brittain, revered author of Testament of Youth.
Roy Hall
Harpenden, Herts
Sir: Having read Charles Moore’s ‘Notes’ about his classmate without ‘special peculiarities’ (31 July) I was reminded of one of my schoolfriends, whose father, confronted by the question about peculiarities on his son’s passport application, had entered (somewhat harshly) ‘none visible’.
Sir Michael Ferguson Davie
Bath
Because you read about migrants
Also by The Spectator
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in