Dot Wordsworth

Mind Your Language | 25 September 2004

A Lexicographer writes

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Raggedness in early 20th-century English eyes also constituted a characteristic of artistic and intellectual bohemia. ‘The lumpen-proletarian fringe,’ wrote Orwell in Inside the Whale (1940), was ‘composed partly of genuine artists and partly of genuine scoundrels.’ Four years later Arthur Koestler saw the intelligentsia becoming ‘the Lumpen-Bourgeoisie in its decay’.

Koestler was a German speaker, but by his time lumpen had become a word for ‘boorish, stupid, unenlightened’. After the second world war, it became increasingly unclear what connotations lumpen carried in any particular example of its usage. The lumpen-avant-garde or lumpen-aesthetics seems to suggest stupidity. In our own time I can often make best sense of its use by some writers by the supposition that they think lumpen means ‘lumpy’, or ‘lumpish’.

I think the nearest to the ODNB usage is found in a piece in the Times Literary Supplement of 6 October 1972 which said that ‘the lumpenbourgeoisie, behind a variety of leaders, is sick of dissent — student demonstrations, pornography, anti-apartheid, drug-taking, immigration, drugs and crime’. Apart from the pornography, these were the things that Philip Larkin, for example, was inveighing against at the time.

The funny thing is that quite independently of Marx, lump, especially as in ‘lump of clay’, has for centuries been used in English to refer to the earthy side of human nature, the clay vessels in which we subsist. The original idea no doubt came from Genesis, and Shakespeare in Hamlet has Caesar’s dead clay used to keep out the draught. Bishop Beveridge in a sermon in 1729 looked forward to the day when, ‘being freed from these lumps of clay we shall be made like to the glorious angels’.

In that day we shall not need to read the newspapers. Until then I shall keep on taking in the Telegraph, or my husband will demand to know the reason why.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in