Already a subscriber? Log in
Slash sounds like an Americanism, and is also denounced by some as a Microsoftism. There is some controversy over the terminology within the BBC. In a thoughtful document called Working with BBC Radio 4 (updated October 2005) comes the statement, ‘It is BBC policy to say “slash Radio 4” not “forward slash Radio 4”.’ But I seem to remember that John Humphrys doesn’t like calling it slash at all.
Some listeners certainly hate it, probably because slash conjures up images of slashed faces. It is also a slang word for ‘an act of urination’ or the verb ‘urinate’. But now I learn of a meaning more unpleasant than either.
I am led to believe by the internet that slash fiction is the name for homosexual tales of couplings between fictional men. Kirk/Spock in the 1970s is said to have been the first such story, involving characters from the Star Trek television series. It was published in a trekky fanzine. (There is also a distinction between groupy fans of Star Trek, known as trekkies, and more serious followers, known as trekkers. Trekkies say that trekkers are trekkies who are ashamed of being trekkies.) Lesbian pairings are not covered by the term slash fiction, the preferred denomination being femslash.
My husband would believe none of this at first telling and insisted I had been subjected to a practical joke. But I’m afraid it is true. This is pretty tawdry, dull and obsessional, but is I daresay widespread among the bedroom-bound votaries of the glowing screen.
In any case it leaves us no nearer finding an agreed name for the /. My preference is for stroke.
Trending
Also in Society
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in