Already a subscriber? Log in
Dr Robert Johnston
Northampton
Less is more
Sir: In The Spectator’s Notes (29 March), Charles Moore condemns the phrase ‘any time soon’ on the grounds that the word ‘soon’ is sturdy enough to stand on its own. But his paragraph starts off with the phrase, ‘More and more people’.
Is ‘more and more’ a greater number than ‘more’?
Edward Hurworth
Chislehurst, Kent
Obama’s snake-oil
Sir: Matthew Parris (Another voice, 29 March) defends Barack Obama’s speech on race very well. But surely we ought to resist the core of Mr Obama’s case?
The Reverend Wright said some horribly stupid things, and Mr Obama rightly distances himself from them. Mr Obama was on half-decent territory when he said that black and white ‘bitterness and bias’ are sort of equivalent. (Though he might have stressed that one is indulged and the other isn’t.) Still, we don’t have to accept Mr Obama’s insistence that he be allowed to build a case on ‘the black experience’.
Suppose a BNP (or a Labour or even a Tory) speaker argued that while he’ll renounce any strongly racist utterance, he can’t altogether renounce nastiness among working-class people, and not only because there is nastiness among upper-class people, but more because it’s all part of the white working-class collective thing.
Mr Obama says he can’t renounce the ‘black community’, warts and all. Wouldn’t we say that this is the curse of identity politics? I have a nasty feeling that Mr Obama’s speech is the cleverest sort of snake-oil — the kind that has queues of intellectuals lining up to endorse it.
Richard D. North
Fellow, The Social Affairs Unit, London W1
Life and death issue
Sir: May I be allowed a single comment on the gracious article concerning myself (‘A holy man tipped to lead the nation’s Catholics’, 22 March)? Towards its end, in response to a question as to whether I would ever leave my monastery, I am credited with the words: ‘Yes, I think it is time to leave. I can’t stay there forever…’ I find no trace of these words in the recording I made of the interview. Certainly they do not express my mind. As a Benedictine with a vow of stability, I cherish the intention of living and dying in my own community, and have my heart firmly set on the plot in our cemetery which awaits me. For a monk, this is not a minor matter.
Dom Hugh Gilbert, OSB
Pluscarden Abbey, Moray
Puzzlement and delight
Sir: I read the article by David Selbourne (‘We are living in a state of emergency’, 29 March) with a mixture of delight and puzzlement; delight at the argument thereof — apart from the references to Cromwell, whose republican experiment ended in failure in 1660 with the Restoration — and puzzlement to the authorship.
Can this be the same David Selbourne who argued in a previous issue (‘No more Pax Americana’, 14 April 2007) that he hoped resurgent Islam would arise again and punish us all for our wickedness? Are there two David Selbournes or is there only one, who has had a Pauline conversion, and now understands the real menace of Islamist fascism and the need for proper pride in our present liberal democracies and their collective heritages?
I think we should be told.
John Draper
Via email
A slow run thing
Sir: Henry Sands is quite wrong (Diary, 22 March) when he claims that his pal Mr Tolstoy recorded the slowest time of the season on the Cresta Run this year. A chap with a group from Krug champagne posted a time of 197 seconds; I witnessed it and it was nothing short of exquisite, in a way. I think it gave me frostbite.
Mr Sands should apologise to his literary chum.
John Springs
London SW3
Taste the difference
Sir: I was initially impressed by Charles Moore’s son’s theory regarding the position of our taste buds (The Spectator’s Notes, 29 March), according to which canapés and open sandwiches are served the wrong way up. But as I have discovered after some experiments of my own, there is a problem aside from the obvious one of gravity. This is that the roof of the mouth is very tender and does not respond well to having abrasive foodstuffs pressed against it. It would make much better sense if the taste buds were up there and the tongue was merely a probe for heat and texture. Reluctantly, I conclude that canapés are not put together wrongly, but that we are.
John Squibb
Shropshire
Also in Society
Also by The Spectator
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in