Dot Wordsworth

Mind Your Language | 14 March 2009

Dot Wordsworth looks into quantitative easing

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

In the novel, a trick is played on a fat, high-living magistrate called Frogmore, whose drink is doctored. When he gets up from bed with belly-ache, he finds his waistcoat won’t meet across his stomach and he fears mortal bloating, unaware that the garment has been taken in while he slept. Smollett constructs a scene where he is straining at stool, attended by a parson holding his nose. ‘The doctor, entered the chamber at this juncture, and found Frogmore enthroned on an easing-chair, under the pressure of a double evacuation. The short intervals betwixt every heave he employed in crying for mercy, confessing his sins, or asking the vicar’s opinion of his case.’ Very funny, I’m sure.

I do not know if Alistair Darling or Mervyn King practise their debasement of the currency while enthroned on easing-chairs or whether they merely hire agents from some well-known house of easement. In any case, quantitative easing just missed the OED when it revised its entry for quantitative in December 2008, even though the term had already been uttered between groans by desperate economists. The OED did pick up quantitative research, undertaken in 2005 by some investment bank.

Quantitative refers, plainly enough, to an amount of stuff. In English the adverb quantitatively appears first, in the 16th century, in something written by Thomas Cranmer about transubstantiation. The word merely represented the late Latin adverb quantitative, which was used in British works written in Latin in the 13th century.

The modern cliché of calling someone ‘a bit of an unknown quantity’ derives from algebra. In the Cyclopaedia published in 1728 by the energetic Fellow of the Royal Society Ephraim Chambers, it is explained that the root of an equation is its unknown quantity. As is the effect of this current outburst of economic easing.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in