The Spectator

Letters | 18 October 2012

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Boris Johnson’s master performance in Birmingham shows that rank and file Conservatives may well have lost sight of this overhanging danger. ‘We have the right time zone, we have the right language, and we have the right government in Westminster,’ Boris boomed from the stage. And 3,000 Conservatives — not one of whom could possibly agree with the last tenet if they had thought twice about it — hurrahed.
Paul Newman, former Conservative party parliamentary candidate
By email 

Protect the children

Sir: Carol Sarler should be warmly applauded for her piece ‘Not in front of the children’ (13 October).

One of my abiding memories of the Falklands War is of a broadcast interview with a mother who had just lost a teenage son, who had been serving in the Royal Navy, in the early stages of the campaign. Asked if she wanted to cry, she said, ‘Yes, but I won’t, because I have to think of my other children’.

That is true motherhood.
Christopher Arthur
Durham

Drugs, fear and ignorance

Sir: Ignorance breeds fear, and Peter Hitchens’s article (‘High society’, 13 October) is nothing if not ignorant. In saying that the government quietly allows the use of prohibited drugs, he ignores the fact that without drug offender-related convictions our prison population would be a fraction of what it is today. He refers to a ‘properly enforced law’ as being the best weapon against peer pressure on kids to take drugs, and ignores the fact that it is the prohibition of such drugs that puts the distribution and profits from drugs beyond regulation and creates a vast criminal and terrorist economy.

It is the fear created by such ignorance that is in a very real way responsible for every casualty of drugs under the present prohibition. The way forward is proper regulation of all substances, including legal ones. Control or live in fear, that is the choice.
Jonathan Wynne Evans
Loch Ness Clay Works, Drumnadrochit

Trumped again

Sir: The hand chosen by Janet de Botton for the Bridge column last week (13 October) is very interesting, and illustrates the importance of establishing distribution in No Trump contracts. While it is clear that the defence upon execution was poor, especially on account of the bad diamond split, I would be interested to see if Janet can possibly come up with similar hands where 3NT is made with a minimal 22-24 points; and, if there are any useful techniques that can be applied in making them, not least because Neil Rosen, cited in the article, once reprimanded me for having a system that gets me into precisely the same position.
Alex Brett
Southgate

No compensation

Sir: My sister Susie, attending West Heath School with the (then) Lady Diana Spencer in 1977, loaned the future princess a shilling for the tuck shop. I imagine she has even less chance of getting her money back than Justin Webb (Diary, 13 October) has of receiving a cheque for $2.70 after paying for Mitt Romney’s sandwiches.
Christopher Harvie
Hazyview, South Africa

Cameron for Archbishop

Sir: I hear what you say in your leading article of 6 October (‘The right Revd’), but do you see what I mean?

David Cameron would make an excellent Archbishop of Canterbury and Dr Sentamu a suitable Prime Minister.
Beverley J. Pyke
Alderney

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in