Susanna Gross

Bridge | 29 November 2012

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

He may have been a hopeless dummy, but at least Culbertson never rushed the play when he was declarer — a far more common form of impatience among the rest of us. This hand cropped up during a game of rubber bridge. Declarer saw dummy, thanked his partner, and immediately played the wrong card:

West led the A, declarer played low from dummy and East discouraged with the 2. West switched to clubs. Declarer won, cashed the ♠A, then the ♣KQ and the K — but then had to put West on play and eventually lose a diamond.

If South had slowed himself down at trick 1, he might have seen the need to play dummy’s K under the A. If trumps don’t divide 1–1 the only hope is to find West with a diamond void. Declarer can now eliminate hearts by coming to hand with the Q and ruffing a heart — then exiting with a spade for a ruff-and-discard from West.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in