Susanna Gross

Bridge | 3 January 2013

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

You’d think that after many decades of playing, world-class players would begin to feel weary of bridge; after all, haven’t they seen most types of hand before? Not a bit of it: every new hand is a fresh challenge, and former deals are remembered as fondly as if they happened yesterday. The world-famous Geir Helgemo, for instance, was recently reminiscing about a hand which he played back in 1988 at the age of 18, representing Norway against Sweden in his first European Junior Championship. Look at the beautiful simplicity of his solution to the problem:

North, Helgemo’s partner, bid 4NT to give Helgemo (South) a choice of minor suits, and Helgemo obviously bid clubs. West led the ♠A, which Helgemo ruffed. Next, he ruffed a heart to hand, and ran the 8 to East’s K. West returned a spade, ruffed in dummy, and now Helgemo had to find a way to draw trumps without allowing the defence to score any spade tricks. His solution? He led the ♣9 from dummy, and ran it to West’s ♣K (it wouldn’t have helped if East had covered with the ♣J, as Helgemo would put up the ♣Q, promoting his ♣10). There was nothing the defenders could now do: he could ruff the third round of spades with the ♣A, ruff a heart back to hand and draw one more round of trumps with the ♣Q.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in