Raymond Keene

Duchamp/Cage

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

In 1925 he had his chance to become France’s chess champion. He started well in the tournament, but blundered in a winning position against the eventual victor Robert Crepeaux, and then, doubtless discouraged, lost to Casier. Duchamp ended up in sixth place.

Twenty years later he returned to art when he began to work on ‘Etant donnés’. Its appearance surprised most of the art world, who believed he’d completely given up art for chess.

His enduring masterpiece ‘Fountain’, an upside-down urinal signed ‘R.Mutt’, was notoriously rejected by the American Sociey of Independent Artists in 1917, but declared the most influential work of the 20th century by a Turner Prize committee in 2004. When it was displayed at the Pompidou in 2006, a performance artist attacked the work with a hammer, chipping it. He claimed Duchamp would have approved of this addition to his work.

For John Cage’s birthday at the Chelsea Arts Club in 1990, attended by Marcel’s widow Teeny, Barry Martin, the vice-president and doyen of the club chess circle, arranged for the birthday cake to be a lifesize replica of ‘Fountain’.

Duchamp and Man Ray played chess against each other many times. An intriguing item is the record of a game played between Duchamp (White) and Man Ray (Black), identified as a joint work and written in English descriptive notation (‘Chess Record’, April 1921). The item maddeningly only shows White’s moves, not Black’s. From the starting position White checkmates in 50 moves, and my guess is that each player wrote down his own moves, but on separate sheets of paper. Only by finding Man Ray’s score sheet will we ever know for certain how the complete game went. This week’s game is my attempt at a reconstruction. The position is not designed as a contest of comparative strength but as an artistic co-production. Hence, the missing of mate in 1 en route is irrelevant.

Duchamp-Man Ray, 1921

1 Nc3+ Ke3 2 Rc4 f3 3 Qd1 3 Qd4 is immediate mate. 3 … f2 4 Qe2 checkmate

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in