Debbie Hayton
Already a subscriber? Log in
Nelson, of course, had done nothing wrong, and Suffolk police subsequently apologised to her for its handling of the incident. But now, Nelson has been targeted again, this time by someone called Andrew, a self-described ‘Wallace and grommitt (sic) fanatic’. The account, with 12 followers, accused Nelson of being a ‘clear transphobe’, and demanded that Innocent Drinks, a smoothie company, explain why it followed such an unperson.
Nonentities on the internet make false accusations all the time; what’s astonishing – at least where ‘transphobia’ is cited – is the way that corporations react. You might be forgiven for thinking Innocent ignored the allegation or maybe even challenged it. But you’d be wrong.
‘Hello Andrew. We’ve sorted that out now so thanks a lot for giving us the heads up,’ replied Innocent, implying that it had subsequently ‘unfollowed’ Nelson. This, it seems, is how the internet works. A false accusation of ‘transphobia’ is made. And a person – an ordinary pensioner, in this case – is condemned.
I should know; it happened to me. When The Spectator was accused of ‘transphobia’ last year, one of my articles was cited as evidence. Even being transgender is no defence against this mob. It was enough to condemn this publication in the eyes of the Co-op, which said it was considering no longer advertising with The Spectator.
Back then, the Co-op saw the error of its ways. Perhaps it’s time for Innocent to do the same. It should apologise to Nelson, a pensioner from Suffolk, who has done nothing wrong other than hold mainstream views about sex and gender which many people – myself included – agree with.
Trending
Because you read about gender
Also by Debbie Hayton
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in