Kate Andrews

Will furlough be extended?

• 23 September 2020, 2:49pm

• Text settings

  Text size

  • Small
  • Medium
  • Large

  Line Spacing

  • Compact
  • Normal
  • Spacious
• Comments
• Share

  Share

  Kate Andrews

  Will furlough be extended?

  

  Copy link

  • Linkedin
  • Messenger
  • Email

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

• Weekly delivery of the magazine
• Unlimited access to our website and app
• Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
• Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Most popular

Alexander Larman

What happened to the Rishi Sunak I knew at school?

A move from an all-inclusive offer of wage subsidies to targetted industries would be a meaningful shift in the policy, with businesses most heavily impacted by the new restrictions becoming the focus of the scheme. There is a clear distinction between businesses that can operate legally during certain hours — or operate at all — and businesses that cannot, which is perhaps why the Chancellor is considering ‘creative’ ways to make sure they still have access to financial support.

Yet extension of furlough for even these businesses still falls prey to criticisms over indefinite government payment of workers’ wages. This a criticism that Sunak himself is all too aware of, telling fellow MPs earlier this year that ‘leaving the furlough scheme open forever gives people false hope that it will always be possible to return to the jobs they had before’.

With around 9.3 million workers furloughed at the height of the crisis, an estimated 3.4 million are still having their wages paid by the state. Sadly, it’s more or less certain that when the scheme officially comes to an end, many will discover that their job no longer exists, as consumer demands have shifted and many businesses simply can’t operate as they did before. Extending the furlough scheme again — especially without any guarantee of when a vaccine or treatment could get society back to normal — prolongs the period in which employees are in the dark about their future, and delays their transition into new lines of work.

And then there’s the cost: furlough has been the central piece of the government’s public policy strategy to keep the economy afloat — but it has been the most expensive scheme too, so far costing over £39.3 billion out of the £210 billion plus that has been spent on Covid measures since March. A reduction in the number of companies eligible to use it would reduce its cost, but depending on how long it continued for, the government would still be borrowing billions of pounds to finance wages.

But it looks like the Chancellor may get access to the cash. Yesterday, the governor of the Bank of England Andrew Bailey signalled that he has undergone something of a change of heart: having previously supported the scheme’s conclusion in October, he said it was now time to ‘rethink’ that plan, especially for specific sectors. The Bank of England’s support is vital for the scheme’s extension, as the Bank has acted as the Treasury’s financial lifeline during the crisis, directly financing government to make sure it could bring in all the support measures necessary to tackle Covid-19.