A rich harvest

• Text settings

  Text size

  • Small
  • Medium
  • Large

  Line Spacing

  • Compact
  • Normal
  • Spacious
• Comments
• Share

  Share

  Tony Gould

  A rich harvest

  Copy link

  • Linkedin
  • Messenger
  • Email

• Coda

  Simon Gray

  Faber/Granta, pp. 251

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

• Weekly delivery of the magazine
• Unlimited access to our website and app
• Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
• Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Most popular

Alexander Larman

What happened to the Rishi Sunak I knew at school?

I had already read a draft of the book while Simon was still alive — so alive indeed that I found it impossible to believe (any more than he could) that he was dying. And for the record he did not die of cancer, as some have written. He was partly responsible for this misapprehension, since he made no secret of having lung cancer. Yet in the end the night thoughts and fears of further physical decline and dependency that he scribbled on the yellow legal pads he used for writing as he sat outside his Cretan hotel room, debating with himself whether or not to have one more cigarette, were unfounded: he collapsed and died quickly of a burst aneurysm. There is some satisfaction in the fact that cancer did not have the last word.

Reading the published version of Coda so soon after Simon’s death is, of course, an utterly different experience from reading the work-in-progress, up for discussion and comment, of a friend still very much alive. In my initial enjoyment of the lighter moments and characteristic absurdities that Simon relished and rendered (or embroidered) so memorably — such as the scene in which a nurse from Barbados solemnly discusses with him her writing ambitions while not so deftly removing a catheter from his penis — I had failed to take in the extent to which the book is haunted by death.

Simon makes clear how much both he and Victoria didn’t want to know how long he had to live, and how hard they tried to prevent doctors only too eager to impart this knowledge from doing so. In the end one of these doctors, the one for whom he reserves special venom, tells them anyway — ‘About a year,’ this doctor says, mistaking the nature of the question Simon had started to ask him. Simon comments:

The thing I think I understood immediately, before I’d even thought about it, was that a doctor who tells you that you have a year to live has taken the year away from you — from the moment the sentence was delivered — the sentence that delivered the sentence — the knowledge would never be cleared from my consciousness, the last thought at night, the first in the morning, for the rest of my life.

This diary covers the three or four months between the discovery of his lung cancer — something Simon believed (had to believe?) he would never get, despite his heavy smoking — and his post-radiation-treatment meeting with the doctor who’d delivered the earlier sentence and who now, on the basis of a scan showing that the tumour hadn’t grown in the interim, offered a measure of hope or restitution, at least a deferment of death. This provides an upbeat ending to Coda, a book that of necessity is more tightly structured than the earlier volumes of diaries, in which much of the charm derives from Simon’s readiness to meander ever more zanily while never quite losing sight of the narrative thread. But here, as in its predecessors, the impression of vibrant spontaneity is artfully achieved.

Someone — I forget who — once described Thomas Hardy’s later poetry as the ‘harvest of the novels’. Simon saw himself primarily as a playwright and was ambivalent about the critical — and popular — success of the diaries, feeling it was somehow achieved at the expense of the plays, which attracted far more mixed reviews. He found the plays creatively more challenging, harder to write, and therefore rated them higher and hoped that at least the best of them would endure. As he writes in Coda, ‘I think I’m better than my reputation’.

I think so, too, and if I describe his diary/memoirs as the ‘harvest of the plays’, that is to take nothing away from the latter (after all, pursuing the analogy, no one would deny that several of Hardy’s novels are classics). It’s just that, in the final analysis that the death of a writer inevitably invites, the diaries not only benefit from his experience as a playwright in terms of dramatic immediacy and compression, but also provide the perfect vehicle for the expression of the full range of his unique personality and wit — I would say ‘genius’ were that not such a loaded word and I not in danger of appearing altogether too partial.