Tobias Grey

Amusing, waspish take-down of Jean-Luc Godard: Redoubtable reviewed

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

He’s short-sighted too and Hazanavicius comes up with a wonderful running gag whereby each time Godard gets caught up in a student riot he busts another pair of glasses. Garrel is instantly believable as the socially awkward director whose idea of a good date is to drag Wiazemsky along to a screening of Carl Theodor Dreyer’s The Passion of Joan of Arc.

Their May-to-December romance (Godard was 36 and Wiazemsky 19 when they married) blossomed when the director cast Wiazemsky as a Maoist student in his proto-revolutionary film La Chinoise (1967). From the off there is some very amusing, waspish dialogue but Hazanavicius also misses a few tricks.

In one scene Godard comes back home to Wiazemsky in a huff after a sour screening of La Chinoise at the Chinese Embassy in Paris. ‘They said it was the work of a reactionary imbecile,’ grumbles Godard, who had anticipated the red carpet being rolled out. Nice line, but how much more fun it would have been to see the scene played out in real time as opposed to having it merely talked about.

Hazanavicius’s main focus in Redoubtable (named after an indestructible French submarine that Godard waxes lyrical about) is the director’s disenchantment with the ‘sentimental’ brand of filmmaking that has made him famous with films like À bout de souffle and Le Mépris. Instead he sets his heart on a collective form of political filmmaking without traditional storytelling tropes.

Throughout it all Godard rails against De Gaulle, who he inveighs against as ‘a shit-pump’ at one student demonstration. Here, again, Hazanavicius somewhat fudges his source material. Wiazemsky’s legal guardian was her grandfather François Mauriac, a devout Catholic, who had a glittering career as a novelist and was a fervent ally of De Gaulle. Much to Godard’s chagrin he had to ask the 80-year-old Mauriac for Wiazemsky’s hand in marriage. Now that would have been a scene worth shooting but there is no mention of Mauriac in Hazanavicius’s film and more is the pity.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in