Peter Jones

Ancient & modern | 22 March 2008

Peter Jones on the conspiracies of the Ancient Athenians

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Take the famous affair of the mutilation of the Hermai (good-luck statues of Hermes) and the profanation of the Mysteries. In 415 bc a highly controversial expedition was about to sail to Sicily when drunken youths rampaged around the city defacing Hermai. That was a bad enough omen, but then the Assembly was informed that Alcibiades, the main advocate and leader of the expedition, had been parodying rituals involving the Eleusinian Mysteries. From that it was a short step to implicate Alcibiades in the Hermai incident too, and all hell broke loose. The contemporary historian Thucydides says that Alcibiades’ enemies saw their chance and ‘exaggerated the whole thing and created a tremendous uproar, alleging that it was all a plot to overthrow the democracy’. Alcibiades was allowed to sail, but accusations continued to flow thick and fast, and a panicking Assembly demanded his return. Alcibiades, sensing the hysteria, went into exile.

This is all very typical. Conspirators always have secret, quite implausible agendas. Their plot is frequently associated with a political crisis of some sort. There is a mastermind behind it all, in perfect control of events. Those who uncover the plot are always the only people in the whole world actually privy to the details. Solid evidence is non-existent; it is all a post-hoc construction, invented to serve a purpose. And when the question cui bono? is posed, it is frequently the person revealing the conspiracy who stands to gain the most from it.

Al Fayed’s accusations fit perfectly into this pattern: the royal mastermind with a hidden agenda, the perfect planning, Al Fayed’s exclusive knowledge, the absence of evidence, Al Fayed’s personal interest (clearing his name). Oh yes, we can be sure the country is safe in Al Fayed’s hands.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in