Already a subscriber? Log in
Nine years passed. Stacey, father and foreign correspondent, almost literally ran into the High Commissioner of Uganda in Trafalgar Square: ‘You know what has happened to our poor Bakonjo?’
‘No.’
‘They have rebelled against the government.’
‘Rebelled? I had heard nothing of it.’
The Bakonjo had been oppressed not by the British, not by the central government but by a neighbouring tribe. Isaya had declared himself king and demanded various rights for his people. It all needed tidying up before independence. Would Stacey mediate? In days he was out there, securing a vague brief from the prime minister and then tracking down his friend in the mountains. It was almost as exciting to see the place as the people once more, let alone the meetings and speeches, the importance of his task. Isaya, however, was intoxicated with his new role, seemed set on martyrdom. After much toing and froing, when he was offered a package of rights and guarantees he replied, ‘We prefer to die.’ His small son, Charles Wesley, presented Stacey with a chicken whose feet were tied.
In 1966 Isaya died (poisoned?) and the chicken-giver became king. The struggle continued. The Bakonjo were almost impossible to catch in their mountains and it was simple to slip across the Congo border. Lives were lost. Eventually Charles was offered and accepted schooling in any part of the world he chose, land, a shop, a bus, a private car and a holiday in London. He accepted the offer. Stacey’s loyalty almost cracks: ‘A car, a bus, a shop…? A mess of pottage?’ For 14 years the king stays in America, becoming a hospital orderly. Then in 1993 a new regime restores other (larger and more ancient) monarchies in Uganda. Stacey and Charles are in action once more, Charles returns, there are more speeches and letters but in the end he is not restored.
It is a thrilling adventure. Stacey more or less invented a monarch and a monarchy, was the only white man who befriended the kingdom, was known as ‘Musabuli’ which means ‘He who is lifting them out who are sinking down into swamps’ or ‘the Redeemer’, as in Jesus. Nevertheless he hangs much, perhaps too much on this structure. Politically, the whole thing has come to nothing. There is no reigning king. The subject is not of wide interest. There is a cascade of African names, much repetition and much political detail. Nor are there any notes and he admits to being ‘wilfully subjective’, so this is scarcely history or anthropology. As the quotation suggests, the style is sometimes demanding. The reader, however, is lifted out of some considerable swamps by Musabuli’s boundless commitment and sincerity.
Then there is a postscript. Stacey goes to the mountains again. Aged 70, more than a touch of Quixote about the lanky, stumbling exhausted climber, he is back where he wants to be, gazing out over the green forests. It is a fitting end. Like David Copperfield, it turns out that he and not the king is the hero of his own story.
Also in Book Reviews
Also by Mark Amory
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in