James Hughesonslow

Confessions of a drink driver on a ‘rehab’ course

Banned for a year, James Hughes-Onslow found himself sent to a group discussion class every Friday in which two ladies schooled him in the art of sobriety on the road

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Back at Brixton police station, I spotted the officers I had seen earlier and asked why the police didn’t spend more time chasing criminals and less time trapping motorcyclists. This was not a sensible approach, I was later told, and I didn’t mention it at the magistrates’ court, although I did point out that I have an epileptic daughter, aged 18, who sometimes has seizures at awkward times in the night and needs to be collected by car. Also, my mother is 90 and living alone in Battersea, and needs me to take her shopping occasionally.

And so to the national probation service in Camden Town, where Pamela and Petrina, cheerful ladies of African ancestry, run five-hour drink-drive rehabilitation courses every Friday. Our group consisted of four women and 12 men, and a fine cross-section of cosmopolitan life they were. In discussions about our motoring experiences we were to learn about road rage and attitudes to drink-driving in Nigeria, Ghana, India, Thailand, Sicily, Spain, the US and South Africa. In Sweden it’s zero tolerance, I’m told. I could go on about the strange situations my new friends had found themselves in behind the wheel, but I’d better stick to my own experiences.

On the first day we were invited to divide into groups of four and discuss mitigating factors and aggravating circumstances. Arguing with a policeman is bad form in this country, although elsewhere, I’m told, it’s normal procedure. Failing to provide a specimen is very incriminating, although one poor fellow said he had offered a specimen but the machine didn’t work. I suggested riding a scooter when drunk was not as bad as driving a powerful car, as the only person likely to be hurt was myself. This went down very badly. Had I not heard of motorcyclists mounting the pavement and killing pedestrians and small children in pushchairs? A drunk driver is committing a crime, whatever they are driving, said Petrina.

A popular excuse for drink-driving was emergencies, such as taking a pregnant woman to hospital. This cut no ice with Pamela, who said a man should know that his wife is expecting, and should act as a responsible adult. When I explained that two of our children were born so quickly that I missed their births completely — one of them was delivered on a hospital trolley — she was unforgiving, saying that if she were paid £1 for every time she had heard this excuse, she’d be a rich woman.

It soon became apparent that you do not argue with these ladies, friendly and smiling though they may be. They had ways of separating the good boys and girls from the bad, often recalling things they had said in previous sessions. It was when I argued that my own situation was just bad luck, a complex sequence of unexpected events, that I found myself in serious trouble. ‘You’ll be put in a corner for that,’ whispered my neighbour Craig, who has given up booze completely. ‘Can you share that with us, Craig?’ said Pamela.

I was told there were several points in the evening of the Spectator party when I could have planned my life more sensibly, such as when I agreed to go, when I got on the scooter, and when I came home again. Planning is everything, Pamela told me. It was a mercy, really, that the discussion moved on and I didn’t get a chance to say the police should have been chasing hoodies that evening, not me.

We were presented with scenarios, some real, some imaginary, to see how we would have acted differently. One of the team had been drinking at Glasgow airport because he and his son had been delayed for four hours while waiting for a flight to Luton. He drank more wine on the plane and later took a taxi to London. It was late that night when he got in his car to take his aged dog to the park 500 yards away and was caught by police when, on the way home, he stopped to buy cigarettes. I said he should have fetched a wheelbarrow for the dog, and to have gone into a shop when the police were there. This was the wrong answer.

I like to think my contributions led to a more lively discussion. When presented with moral dilemmas, our group sometimes became reckless. What would you do if you were a student and, the day before an exam, your friendly lecturer offers you a copy of the questions? Why, we’d photocopy them and sell them of course. Poor Pamela clutched her forehead in despair. We were given graphs to show how men and women differ in the units of alcohol they can drink, the damage it does to the liver and the brain, and how long the body takes to get rid of it. We were shown horrifying videos presented by Sir Trevor McDonald, Michael Buerk and Alexei Sayle portraying the trauma that can be caused by drink-driving. I’m afraid I scored nil points for saying Sayle should not have been looking sideways and talking to camera while driving a car. But it did raise a laugh.

We were warned that, if you are banned from driving, police can arrest you for being near your car with your car keys in your pocket, and they’ve been known to mark tyres of a banned driver’s car with chalk to see if it has been moved. At the end of the last session, a splendid circular chart was produced showing ‘Stages in the Process of Change’ such as No thought (no problem), Thinking (gains and losses), Decision (control of alcohol intake), Active change (learning to say No), Continue (sticking to decisions), and Relapse (re-offend). Although I put myself in Active change, Petrina very decisively moved me back to Thinking — at the bottom of the class.

We all received certificates saying we had passed. Mine can go on the wall beside the one which says I once completed the Devizes to Westminster canoe race. Afterwards, half of us adjourned to the pub opposite to compare notes, when we saw two faces looking through the window, smiling and waving. It was Petrina and Pamela. We should have asked them in for a drink but we didn’t quite have the nerve.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in