Mary Killen Mary Killen

Dear Mary | 1 May 2010

Your problems solved

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Q. Re: Christmas cards. First- and second-class stamps can be used at any time after they are purchased, so buy them before the price rises and then wait until December.

S.S., London SW6

A. Thank you to you and all those other thinkers who wrote to point this out. Your brains were sharper than my own on this issue.

Q. I bought the Sunday Times Rich List and was irritated to see that my father’s name did not even appear in the index, despite the fact that he should have been pretty near the top of the pile. How should I go about submitting the evidence to the Sunday Times team — or would this be seen as pushy?

M.T., Northern Ireland

A. Perhaps you do not realise that there exists an ultra-elite who celebrate each year the fact that they have outwitted Philip Beresford, compiler of the list, and that he knows nothing about them. There are few advantages in being identified as rich, even when the details given are inaccurate. You should keep your head down.

Q. The Van Gogh exhibition was so crowded that a lady friend and I found ourselves cheek by jowl with a man bawling into his mobile phone. ‘I’m in the National Gallery,’ he said. ‘No, you’re not,’ said my friend, loudly enough to be heard over the phone. ‘You’re in the Royal Academy.’ Annoyed at the correction, the man tried to claim that this mis-statement was deliberate. ‘If I’d known that,’ said my friend, ‘I would have said “No, you’re not. You’re in bed with your mistress.”’ What would you have said?

P.R., by email

A. Had the banter been good-natured on both sides, then I could not have bettered your friend’s riposte. As a yobbophobe, however, I would have let the man get on with it while I turned my own attention back to the paintings.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in