Mary Killen Mary Killen

Dear Mary | 14 April 2016

Plus: make a pre-emptive strike to stop your husband having an office affair

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Q. My new London flat has a wooden floor which looks very smart and clean. My problem is that when I invite female friends round for a drink they often turn up wearing stilettos and look crestfallen when I ask them to take them off. I don’t care whether they look small or squat without the high shoes, but they do and it clearly ruins their evening. I don’t feel I can ask girls not to wear stilettos when they come round, because they are often going on to another party. What is the answer, Mary?
— R.F., London W11

A. There is no reason not to inform guests that they will be expected to remove their shoes when they turn up at your flat. This is what happens on the yachts of the super-rich and nobody complains, not least because it makes a level playing field. However, why not compromise for impromptu visits by throwing down a Persian rug for the stiletto wearers and asking them to ‘play rafts’?

Q. My husband and I are happily married and he likes his job but he has been headhunted to be interviewed to work alongside a high-profile (and very attractive) woman and is flattered by the overture. Although this woman is by all accounts happily married herself (we have friends in common), I am worried that if the two of them spend 12 high-octane hours per day together at work they will have an affair. Is there a way I could prevent this?
— Name and address withheld

A. If he gets the job, then present to him as further flattery something confided in you by another mutual friend. His new colleague is delighted by his appointment since she considers him super-competent and very likeable. But a main criteria for appointing a man to work alongside her was that she should not find him attractive, since she knows all about the cliché of the office romance and would hate to fall into that trap. This intelligence will boost his professional morale as well as undermining his confidence in the pass-making arena.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in