Isabel Hardman Isabel Hardman

Ed Miliband’s ‘Clause IV moment’: what you need to know

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

This isn’t just a reform that will annoy the unions: it will cost Labour a great deal of the £8 million that it receives from the current arrangement.

2. Primaries for Labour London Mayoral candidate. And there’s a possibility these could be used in parliamentary seats where the local party has few members or needs to be ‘re-energised’.

3. A code of conduct for anyone applying for a parliamentary seat.

4. Spending caps for candidates and the organisations working on their behalf. This would water down the unions’ power to overcome rival candidates through sheer financial might.

5. Standard constituency agreements with unions.

Now, before you get too excited, Miliband is expected to caveat his speech with the admission that many of these reforms will take time (if you want to get an idea of just how long, read Len McCluskey’s anti-reform roar in the Guardian: we may find that fossils have formed over shorter periods of time). But sources close to Miliband are briefing that this speech will show he is not afraid of standing up to the unions, and that he cannot be accused of a sluggish or fearful response to Falkirk. There is of course a notable absence: any meaningful reform of the unions’ role in party leadership contests beyond the end of automatic affiliation, which means the Conservatives can still say he hasn’t gone far enough.

Miliband spent an hour this evening at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party. There were many impassioned speeches from Labour MPs attending the meeting, which was so packed latecomers could barely squeeze through the doors. Coffee House understands that 11 speakers were supportive, two were critical. The Labour leader told MPs that he was quite angry about the situation in Falkirk and that it was ‘about my responsibility to uphold the good name of this party. I have a responsibility to ensure that everything this party does and in every place a candidate is chosen is done in a fair and transparent way’. He told the party that ‘in moments like this, you can sweep it under the carpet or you can seize the moment to make reforms that people have wanted to make for a very long time: we are going to seize that moment.’ He also asked the party for discipline and unity, telling the party that ‘we are not going to let down the hard-working people being screwed by this government’.

Tomorrow he will try to seize that moment, and to seize back control of the narrative, which so far the Tories have led. But over the next few months, the real test of whether Ed Miliband is the strong leader he will try to paint himself as tomorrow will be how much of this reform he can take from the pages of his speech and into reality.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in