Harriet Waugh

Howard’s end reconsidered

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Two people come together to re-examine the facts that led to the conviction for murder in 1970 of a retarded young man called Howard Stamp. His reclusive aunt, Grace, like him afflicted with a cleft palate, was stabbed to death in her house. She had cuts on her legs and thighs before being dispatched in a frenzied attack. The killer then had a bath to wash off the blood, leaving some ginger hairs behind. Howard, who killed himself while in prison, had ginger hair. The killing caused shock waves in the community and it was a relief when the police arrested her misfit nephew.

At the beginning of the novel aggressively arrogant social anthropologist Dr Jonathan Hughes arranges to meet county councillor George Gardiner at a dubious pub in Bournemouth to discuss the possibility of a book exonerating Howard Stamp of the murder. Gardiner has been trying to reopen the case for years while Hughes has written a paper highlighting it. They, and the reader, are in for surprises when they meet. The meeting starts off badly and with the help of the publican Roy Trent, who was a teenager when the murder took place, ends worse. It takes Jonathan’s literary agent Andrew Spicer’s considerable powers of persuasion to get them back together. When they do join forces they find there is a strong likelihood that the disappearance at that time of a 13-year-old schoolgirl called Cill Trevelyan is connected to the death of Grace. All this took place within the confines of a housing estate in Bournemouth in early June 1970. Cill’s best friend claimed that Cill had been gang-raped a few days earlier and it was known that she had a difficult home life. Nothing has been heard of her since.

Gradually a complex picture emerges. Nobody is telling the truth. Could Roy Trent’s ex-wife Cill be the missing Cill? If she isn’t, is her name merely a coincidence? Why did she go through Jonathan’s attaché case? Why does Roy lie for her? Why does Roy want to sow discord between Jonathan and George? Has Cill been murdered? Did Cill murder Grace? What part did her less attractive and jealous best friend Lou play in the drama of those days following Cill’s rape and disappearance and Grace’s death? Who were the three rapists and what consequently happened to them? And, lastly, what about all those horrible parents who were responsible for all those unhappy teenagers?

Some of the answers are fairly obvious, but others twist and turn, seeming one thing, then another. Each character’s personality shifts, as more becomes known. Readers have the overview of the action and the collating of evidence as Jonathan, George, Andrew the agent, and certain characters contribute to the jigsaw. This means they are the only ones who can see how the pieces might slot together. In most crime fiction the detective keeps something up his or her sleeve. This is then sprung on the reader when the villain is unmasked. Here, Jonathan and George have to struggle to find the pattern. Despite the fact that the reader is given far more information than they, nothing is plain sailing. Disordered Minds is a very enjoyable, sophisticated affair.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in