Henry Blofeld

In defence of Australia

[Getty Images]

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

The Lord’s Test Match started the next day and was surrounded by an astonishing buzz of anticipation. On the first day England’s bowlers wasted a good opportunity; on the second, it was the batsmen who kicked a colossal own goal. In the final equation, England had a day and one session to score 371 to level the series. The extraordinary Ben Stokes played one of cricket’s great innings. It deserved to win the match, but 155 was not enough and Australia move on to Headingley for the third Test, two matches up. But before the final ball had been bowled at Lord’s, the foundations of civilisation had begun to crumble. The ground, and especially the members in the pavilion, were consumed by apoplexy at the fall of England’s sixth wicket. Jonny Bairstow allowed the last ball of an over to go through to the wicket keeper and set off up the pitch. Alex Carey, the wicket keeper, then underarmed the ball into the stumps. All Australia appealed and after due consideration Bairstow was rightly given out. As it was the end of the over, Bairstow thought, if he thought at all, there was no problem, but the umpires had not called ‘over’. It is no good being squeamish about these things. The days when ‘it isn’t cricket’ held sway are disappearing. The swelling cry now is ‘let’s get real’. According to the laws of cricket, Bairstow was out. At this point Australia will rest their case.

Before the apoplexy rises to another level, it is worth remembering that although two wrongs seldom make a right, England and Douglas Jardine took the unsporting bowling tactic of Bodyline to Australia in 1932-33. There have been a number of other occasions too when the spirit of cricket has been dented. It is worth asking ourselves if England and the wicket keeper Bairstow, on a similarly frenzied occasion, might have reacted in the same way as Carey. These moments are driven by instant and instinctive reaction fuelled by an acute desire to win. In such a pressurised situation, is it wise for batsmen to be mindful that these things may happen and act accordingly? The hostile reactions of some members of the MCC when the Australians left the field was disgraceful and another instance of two wrongs not making a right.

I spent the Saturday evening of this second Test staying with friends in Hungerford and happily I bumped into Pete Burrell, Frankie Dettori’s masterful agent. He told me a lovely story of the 21-year-old jockey meeting the great England batsman Colin Cowdrey. It happened at Angmering Park, which was the home of Cowdrey’s second wife, Lady Anne Herries, the eldest of the Duke of Norfolk’s daughters. She was herself a trainer and Dettori had come down to work out on one of her horses. He and Cowdrey met at breakfast. Cowdrey asked the young Italian if he liked cricket. ‘I would rather watch paint dry,’ he replied. Cowdrey chuckled and said: ‘Come on Frankie, after breakfast I’ll teach you how to bowl.’ Dettori liked Cowdrey on sight and was keen to learn. Cowdrey taught him to bowl an impressive googly. Burrell saw all this happen and thought for a time about letting them know at Lord’s that he had found a potential match winner. As we know, Dettori stuck to racing, but any jockey who knows how to bowl a googly should surely be up for an immediate Stewards Enquiry. You never know what he might get up to in a mêlée around Tattenham Corner.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in