Ross Clark
Already a subscriber? Log in
In some ways, it may be an act of kindness for employers to put employees on furlough rather than making them redundant. But on the other hand, it means that there will inevitably be some people who are currently hoping to return to their old job rather than doing what would be better for them and the economy in the longer run: looking for opportunities in growing industries.
In the US there is a lively political debate as to whether excessively generous welfare payments — which have been boosted during Covid — have contributed to employers complaining about being unable to fill vacancies. And in the US there isn’t even a furlough scheme.
We haven’t really had that debate in Britain: whether furlough is starving the economy of workers. But we need to, as some employers here, too, have complained about finding it hard to recruit new employees. In the case of the UK, there is an added complication. Brexit has almost certainly dissuaded some EU nationals from seeking work in Britain — although it is hard to disentangle this from the effects of the pandemic. Cross-border travel has been disrupted far more than the loss of EU free movement rules could have done.
On the positive side, new jobs are being created in significant numbers: 197,000 payrolled positions were created in May — although the total number is still down 553,000 on what it was in February 2020. There were 758,000 vacancies advertised in May, which was down 27,000 on the average for the first quarter of 2020. The real test will come with October’s employment figures, covering the immediate period after the end of furlough — assuming the scheme is not extended yet again.
Because you read about covid-19
Also by Ross Clark
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in