Robin Oakley

It is time to fight for the future of racing

If the crowds don’t return for another six months, I seriously fear for the sport’s future

Nowadays racecourses are sad, empty, literally characterless places. Credit: Getty Images / Pool / Pool

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Or so they all did. Nowadays racecourses are sad, empty, literally characterless places attended by only a sprinkling of closely involved professionals. We can all still thrill to the courage and skill of a perfectly timed finish on TV, but there is an element missing. Racing behind closed doors is like a piece for full orchestra being played by a string quartet at the end of an aircraft hangar. It lacks context and emotion. Take the Autumn Double. At Newmarket a fortnight ago, there would have been a fervent welcome-back quality to the applause as veteran jockey Paul Hanagan confirmed his successful return from a broken back by winning the Cambridgeshire Handicap on Majestic Dawn. Last Saturday, after Jason Watson took jump jockey Paul Townend’s advice and weaved through beaten horses on Great White Shark to land an incredible third successive Cesarewitch for Willie Mullins, the message conveyed by an applauding crowd would have been: ‘Yes, Jason: we know it’s been a leanish season by your high standards but we know you’ve still got it.’ Racing is all about a joyous collectivism, and two things worry me. Will the sport survive if we go another six months without at least some crowds on the racecourse, and are the various authorities involved fighting hard enough to ensure that some spectators are allowed back?

Racing, the most watched sport in the country after football, has demonstrated conclusively over four months behind closed doors that it can organise itself responsibly with appropriate social distancing. Before the government pulled the plug on plans for elite sports to allow back some spectators on 1 October, Doncaster and Warwick conducted successful pilots. Most racing spectators arrive by car rather than public transport and spend the day in the open air. Though racing-colours scarves may be worn to show support for favourite horses, racing followers, unlike football fans, are not split into potentially clashing rival tribes who might mingle dangerously.

Nor is there any logic about the current position. The public may use bars and restaurants on racecourses provided there is no racing that day. Except in high-risk areas, people from more than one household can go to a pub and watch racing together on TV. The Prime Minister is encouraging people to save jobs in entertainment by going to the cinema, and venues such as the Royal Albert Hall and the O2 are to admit limited crowds from December. Yet the message to racing is that crowds are unlikely to be permitted on track for another six months. Racing’s authorities have been pressing behind the scenes for change but have so far done so comparatively quietly, partly for fear of losing what we have already — the racing behind closed doors that does at least bring some income into the sport — and partly, I suspect, because racing, which has plenty of enemies in the media, is seen wrongly as a sport for well-connected toffs and doesn’t want to be seen as conducting special pleading when so many other industries are in a mess.

The time has come for racing’s case to be made with much more vigour — asking not for handouts but simply to be allowed to conduct more well thought out and limited admission schemes. If we have to wait six months to get back on track, racing habits and loyalties will die and there will be a lot less racing to return to.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in