Christopher Fildes

It’s the Schwed Test: was your money stolenor did you just lose it?

It’s the Schwed Test: was your money stolen or did you just lose it?

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Through a hedge, backwards

Some funds have done well by the simple technique of borrowing short and lending long, but even that, by definition, is risky. Some put their faith in a formula, like the Nobel prizewinners who went down with Long Term Capital Management by failing to distinguish the improbable from the impossible. Some look for quick turns. Few are transparent, for that, after all, might give the game away. Quite what risks they may be running, some of their holders will find out the hard way, and whatever the answer may be to the $250 million question in Florida, the Schwed Test will prove a true guide. Schwed himself supplied the answer: ‘Nothing crooked — just bad luck and bad brains met together in an effort to do something that couldn’t be done in the first place.’

A game of two halves

London Stock Exchange 1 (Seifert (o.g.)), Deutsche Börse 0 (after extra time). Now there’s a turn-up for the book. The home side still has to meet Euronext, but if Jean-Fran

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in