The Spectator

Letters | 24 November 2016

Also in Spectator Letters: Brexit, the NHS, educational standards, love at first sight, and rude names

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

We should be proud of our achievement in helping to build the European Union in past years. Instead of working for change within the EU, we leave it as the result of a slender majority in the referendum. I fear for my grandchildren in 20 years’ time.
Ian Sutherland
Eversley, Hampshire

Russian lessons

Sir: The outrage of the metropolitan elite in the face of Brexit, Trump et al (‘The new normal’, 19 November) reminds me of learning Russian in the 1960s. In those Cold War days the only native speakers we could meet to practise the language with were emigrés. They were charming and educated people deeply distressed at what had happened to their country, but they completely failed to grasp that they might themselves be partly responsible for the revolution.
Prof Robin Jacoby
Hethe, Oxon

NHS rationing

Sir: Rod Liddle is right to say that this is the year when the previous ‘givens’ of the past 50 years are questioned (‘The new normal’, 19 November). He mentions many examples — economic, social and political — but he doesn’t dare mention the greatest shibboleth of then all: the NHS. It has long been a given that governments of both hues will criticise each other for not putting enough resources into the health service and, when in power, continuing to pour money into that bottomless pit. When are we going to have a rational debate that talks about rationing of services to suit our indebted nation? It must be time to look at the original idea again and come up with a more achievable goal than simply free services for all.
Hugo Johnsen
Suffolk

Declining standards

Sir: Charles Moore’s concern about the standard of English currently expected of young people (Notes, 19 November) is well-founded, and evidence of a similar decline can be found in other subjects. In modern languages, candidates are no longer required to write a brief essay in the target language; and in physics, questions once deemed suitable for 16-year-olds at O-level are now found at A-level.

In February the OECD published a report on educational standards in 29 developed countries, which showed that the standard of literacy and numeracy of young people in this country has slumped from top to bottom over a generation.
Peter Inson
East Mersea, Essex

The look of love

Sir: Ariane Sherine may have been unlucky in love (‘The perfect mismatch’, 19 November), but surely she is not saying Marlowe and Shakespeare were both wrong: ‘Who ever loved that loved not at first sight’?
Michael McManus
Leeds

On conscription

Sir: Allan Mallinson’s perceptive review of Sir Richard Dannatt’s Boots on the Ground (Books, 12 November) calls on the author to include corrections in subsequent editions. Can I, in turn, correct the reviewer on one point: he refers to National Service (1945–1960), as ‘the only time in the nation’s history that conscription has obtained in peacetime’. Not so: conscription was introduced in April 1939 under the Military Training Act, six months before the declaration of war on Germany in September.
Dr John Stevenson
Down St Mary, Devon

Name and shame

Sir: Mrs Fanny Prior (Letters, 12 November) laments being asked for her first name and says she replies ‘Mrs’. Since leaving school I have almost only been addressed by my first name (except by judges), or sometimes ‘Mr Simon’. I cannot think why…
Simon Cockshutt
London W5

Perfect pairing

Sir: My heart goes out to Dickie Ellis (Letters, 19 November). Since my first boyfriend was a German named Willi and my first husband was Roger, he and I could have been made for each other.
Fanny Prior
London NW3

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in