Andrew Lambirth

Look back with pleasure

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

A couple of white sculptures by Carole Hodgson, which apparently refer to the landscape of west Wales, are the first objects you encounter. Plaster uprights on plinths, they look like blanched slices of shale or slate, and echo the small henge of paired lumps of chalk by Nick Pope, set some way off on the floor. But the big impact in this large space is made by the two Bert Irvin paintings: dynamic with diagonals, vibrant or opaque. In comparison, James Faure Walker’s messy abstract ‘Lazy Afternoons’, with its Monet waterlily references, looks clumsy — like a pattern of handprints to ward off the evil eye gone mad. The other picture here is an optical field painting by Barrie Cook, consisting of repeated vertical forms like burnt matches or cotton buds, exploring white/black and blue/red. Amiable, but without the mental shiver you get from Bridget Riley. Also in this room are John Cobb’s disassembled wooden construction ‘Easy Chair’, and Garth Evans’s flat plywood spiral, like a coir floormat, rippling outwards from a circular centre in waves of distortion.

That feeling of sculpture taking itself to pieces and pondering the remains continues into what is called the ‘Back Space’. Occupying much of the floor is Jeff Lowe’s surrealist assembly of forms in zinc-plated steel, stone and slate. On the walls are a couple of typical Stephen Buckley oils, all low-relief geometry and fabric pattern. Michael Mason is represented by a collage of ‘Vac Forms’, four envelopes of photos, diagrams and lists, and the maquette for a far larger sculpture called ‘Agincourt’. This seems to have been a playful architectural interpretation of the mediaeval battle. Thankfully, the tone of this room is boosted by the inclusion of Prunella Clough.

Clough is one of those refreshingly diffident painters the English produce from time to time, whose originality is unmistakable and more far-reaching than many a noisier and more celebrated talent. No one could particularise a painting’s surface in quite such an exquisitely varied way. Clough was a supreme manipulator of textures, a tonal painter who painted the organic and natural world besieged by man-made detail, the latter often depicted in rainbow hues. So here, in this typically poetic image (‘Untitled with four elements’), she juxtaposes the geometric and the organic, the linear and volumetric, in quiet buff and grey. Colour is reserved for an elbow of tubing which obtrudes into the bottom-left corner, in green, pink, yellow and white. Like most of Clough’s paintings, its reticence is deceptive: it withstands a lot of looking.

The other exhibits are arranged around a balcony, which looks down on to the floor below. (The architecture of the Bloomberg building is dramatic, but does not compete unfairly with the exhibits.) Four collages by John Stezaker are the cut-out silhouettes of film stars (is that Orson Welles, by any chance?), only the surrounds remaining from the original magazine photos, their features excised and dark. These make a wild contrast with the meticulously observed realism of Euan Uglow’s portrait, ‘Head of Pat’, painted over five years of rigorous and unrelenting scrutiny. The radical nature of Uglow’s painting is still underestimated. Perhaps the forthcoming catalogue raisonné of his work will help to draw attention to its originality and inventiveness.

A complex film installation by Tony Sinden consists of a pair of black screens, each with a grey plastic chair set off to one side, with framed photographic accoutrements. Film plays continually on each screen, of a figure interacting with a similar chair. It’s all about the relationship between still and moving, real and projected objects, I suppose — fine if you enjoy that sort of thing. There are three albums of images by the maverick performance artist Genesis P-Orridge, which are obscure and of little obvious interest; hardly worthy of the instigator of ‘Throbbing Gristle’ and ‘Industrial Music’. A video loop of Charlie Hooker’s 1979 performance, ‘Stroll On’, re-enacted in early August, is playing on a monitor. I recall the late Ken Kiff singing Hooker’s praises and suggesting he would make a provocative artist in residence at the National Gallery.

As is usual in these mixed exhibitions, it’s the paintings which stand out: Uglow, Clough, Irvin. For these alone the show is worth a look. The gallery is open Tuesday– Saturday, 11 a.m.–6 p.m. Another performance of Charlie Hooker’s ‘Stroll On’ will take place at 7 p.m. on Friday, 16 September to mark the end of the exhibition. Email: gallery@bloomberg.net to reserve a space.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in