Already a subscriber? Log in
‘Determining the sticky quotient of your website requires server log analysis,’ says some site not unconnected with server-log analysts. ‘These stats can tell you how long each visitor stayed at your site, how often they return and what drew their attention.’
I’m not sure how we managed before the word sticky came into use. In the 16th century they had to make do with words such as glutinous or gluish (a word used in the 14th century for the pitch on the infant Moses’ little ark of bulrushes). The word sticky was used first to mean ‘like a stick’. Only in the 18th century did it find employment in the adhesive sense.
The word stickiness has recently been recruited for scientific use, describing forces that keep atoms together, as if this metaphor explained anything. There is even a tiny particle called a gluon, postulated in 1971 and defined by a series of terms probably unknown to us innocent bystanders: ‘Any of a group of massless bosons possessing colour that are postulated as carriers of the colour force that binds quarks together in a hadron.’
Long may it thrive. To most of us, a far more useful semi-adhesive item is called by some a sticky or, by those who like using proprietary names, a Post-it note. Both words were harvested in 2003 for draft entries for the OED.
Since 1969 Pritt has been sold, being marketed in Britain as ‘the non-sticky sticky stuff’. Similarly non-sticky is Blu Tack, dating from the 1970s, with a version made by another manufacturer going under the name Sticky Tack. A generation was in search of not very sticky stickiness, but now it appears that the bird-lime merchants of the internet will stick at nothing to maximise their stickiness.
Also in Society
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in