Already a subscriber? Log in
In a light-hearted attempt to cobble up an etymology for a Latin word-form tellego* (the star indicating a form that has not been cited from any source) as the contrary of intellego (later, intelligo), Mr Nicholls even had recourse to the fictional character Telegonus, although he has only one l, and was, as far as I am aware, Greek. He might, perhaps, have tried to derive telligens from the gens, ‘people’, of the tellus, ‘earth’. Sounds stupid enough.
I know that tellus forms the genitive as telluris, but a Latin text from an English source, written in 816 and quoted in the Oxford English Dictionary, similarly misuses tellus: ‘Tamen serventur libros primordiales cum aliis telligraffis’. From this ill-formed Latin word, of which other pre-Conquest examples from Britain are known, an English word, telligraph, was derived, meaning ‘a charter of lands in which the bounds are described’. Nothing to do with telegraph.
But in fact there is no Latin word tellego. Intellego or intelligo bears a modification of the prefix inter-. Intellegere comes from legere, ‘bring together, pick out, catch with the eye, read’, and inter-, ‘between, within’.
Even if it had borne the prefix in-, that in- might have come from the Latin adverb and preposition meaning ‘into, in, within, on, towards, against’, or sometimes having ‘little appreciable force’ in the careful words of the OED – as if the force might somehow be detected under a microscope.
Most of the ordinary English words from intelligere, such as intelligent, intelligence, intellect, came into use by the late 14th century, the days of William of Wykeham.
Also in Society
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in