Already a subscriber? Log in
To Ed’s interlocutors, ‘intergenerational equity’ is to do with ‘sustainable development’, global warming and all that. In other words, not leaving the planet a wreck for our grandchildren, if any. It is heartening in a way, because it militates against the Keynesian notion that ‘in the long-term we’re all dead’.
As a rallying cry for a revitalised Labour party, though, it lacks a certain bite. There is a seminal source-document on the question called ‘Awakening to the Intergenerational Equity Debate in Canada’. Imagine! ‘Awakening’ is the killer word. It would be like awakening to find a dead caribou in the bed.
The language of David Miliband’s famous article in the Guardian last week was less puzzling. I found the weirdest phrase to be: ‘We green the largest single market in the world.’ It sounded like a cross between ‘He do the police in different voices’ and ‘The biggest aspidistra in the world’.
There was a pleasing mixed metaphor: ‘targeting the spike in gun crime’ (not ‘spiking the guns in crime targets’); a displeasing enjambment of jargon, ‘social norms around women’s and minority rights transformed’; and a flight into poetry, ‘The Tories overclaim for what they are against’ (expenses?).
Now my husband tells me that the article might have been written by someone else. It is quite normal among politicians, apparently. But the language, if only ventriloquistic Milibandese, fits the image sought.
Also in Society
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in