Dot Wordsworth

Names

Names

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

What is a tragic burden for the middle classes is to find a rarer name of classy pedigree suddenly become the name shouted in supermarkets at toddlers in tantrums: ‘Jason! Shut that row.’ I can’t find anyone called Jason in all 60 volumes of the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, and it must have been most unusual in 1928 when the future Bishop of Derby was born to Jason and Janet Dawes. Even in 1959, when Viscount Norwich’s heir, the Hon Jason Cooper, was born, it was still rare. It has made up for lost time.

In the top ten names for boys in 2011, number nine is Riley; for girls, Ruby. Obviously Riley is out of the question for the middle classes. Might as well call the poor mite Toilet and be done with it. Ruby is one of those old gem names like Emerald that has regained popularity. Unfortunately, since its first flush, it has entered the vocabulary of rhyming slang, thanks to Ruby Murray, with the meaning ‘curry’.

These rankings of names by popularity came from a sample of 434,756 babies born to members of something called the Bounty Parenting Club. If the press reports are right about that number, it represents more than half those born in the United Kingdom. A quite different picture comes from a monitoring of the Times and Telegraph births columns. Though Harry topped the Times list, it tied with William, which didn’t make the top 10 Bounty babies list. In the Telegraph, Henry came first, with William second and Harry (as distinct from Henry) third. Oddly, Florence was the most popular name for girls in the Telegraph, though missing the top ten in the Times.

In reality the most common baby boy’s name in Britain is Mohammed, though the variation in spelling obscures its popularity. No doubt it is steadily making its way up that most diaphanous of structures, the social class ladder.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in