Laura Freeman
Already a subscriber? Log in
Aged 20, studying at the Ruskin School of Art in Oxford during the war, he sketched heads after Dürer and Rembrandt in the Ashmolean Museum and African sculpture at the Pitt Rivers, but realised that what he wanted, all he wanted, was to ‘make things’. The Ruskin didn’t offer sculpture so he transferred to the Slade in London. Living in digs at Cartwright Gardens, eating rationed bacon and pasta shells sent by his mother, he began making with a fierce concentration.
A pair of photo-lithographs of ‘The Sculptor’s Studio’ (1977) hang in the last room of the Whitechapel Gallery’s Eduardo Paolozzi retrospective. They show a workspace crammed, skirting to rafters, with models, tools, materials, scraps and rubbish. Cluttered, but with a sense that its owner could find you anything you wanted, from a plastic frog to a bronze head of Wittgenstein.
Everything interested him. Asked on Desert Island Discs in 1990 about his mania for collecting ‘junk’, he replied defensively: ‘I’m very selective about the kind of junk.’ He collected cigarette cards, clock parts, broken combs, bent forks, bits of bark, kitchenware from Woolworths and magazines given to him in Paris by the wives of American GIs. He talked of the cuttings he pasted in his scrapbooks as being ‘like exotic and rare butterflies mounted in the Natural History Museum’.
You have a sense of this in the Whitechapel’s early rooms, as Paolozzi flits from idea to idea — Picasso, abstraction, the figure — and medium to medium — concrete, plaster, screenprint, film. He tries his hand at a printed fabric for a cocktail dress sold by Horrockses Fashions (1953), and later a djellaba tunic for Lanvin (1971) and bone-china plates for Wedgwood (1968/9).
Paolozzi was not a slim man — blame the ice cream and pasta shells — but you do have to run to keep up with him. While you’re admiring the homely wool of the ‘Whitworth Tapestry’ (1967), he’s on to sheeny-shiny chrome-and-aluminium ‘Silver Sixties’ sculptures. He rejected the label ‘pop artist’. Donald Duck and Goofy may grin from his screenprints and Mickey and Minnie Mouse share an Eskimo-kiss nose-to-nose in the ‘Whitworth Tapestry’, but Paolozzi was clear: ‘If I am called a “pop artist” then people expect to see soup tins.’
You see him in the Whitechapel exhibition having a joke about such labels. In his screenprint ‘Avant garde’ (1971) each letter of the phrase is filled with a monster pulling a googly face. He invented his own word, ‘Bash’, which stood for ‘Baroque All Style High’. It didn’t catch on.
Paolozzi was garrulous, a prolific writer of letters of complaint, untitled poems, unfinished novels, explanations and exculpations of his work. The curators Daniel F. Herrmann and Cameron Foote have been reticent. I’m usually for minimal gallery texts, but in the case of Paolozzi, as he ‘shuffles’ — his word — between one scheme and the next, you want guidance. As he dashes ahead, you need someone to help you play catch-up. The catalogue, if you can stretch to £30, is superb.
But making is nothing, said Paolozzi, without looking. When he taught ceramics at the Royal College of Art in the 1980s, he wrote this report: ‘Finding the courage to be truly creative, finding the courage to be truly disciplined, realising that endless hours of just “making” leads inevitably to some form of mediocrity, finding the discipline to go to the Tate and enjoy Blake or stare at cubism, learning that an hour at the National Gallery can be more influential than a trip to the Crafts Council — that is what we must instil.’
Because you read about desert island discs
Also by Laura Freeman
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in