Blair Gibbs

Only police reform can keep politics out of policing

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

So, it’s ironic that the resignation of Sir Paul Stephenson is now being used by some to question the coalition’s plans for elected Police & Crime Commissioners (PCCs). These figures would replace Police Authorities – invisible and costly committees of appointees – with a single directly-elected personality, who would provide civilian oversight of the police.

Opponents have been propagating scare stories about extremist candidates and other bogus arguments for months. Equally, many of the policing establishment continue to make a constitutional argument about politicisation of the police. The Association of Chief Police Officers has lobbied hard to defend the status quo under the banner of the office of constable and on numerous occasions has implied that this is somehow under threat from an elected Police Commissioner.

But it is precisely because we need to keep politics out of policing that PCCs are such a necessary reform. By respecting the operational independence of the police, they will serve to insulate the chief constable from politics, liberating police officers to fight crime. And an elected Police Commissioner is effectively a public safety mayor, who will help to hold the police to account, ensuring that local people get the sort of policing they deserve.

Crime-fighting is what matters most to the police, and the reputation of organisations like the Metropolitan Police ultimately rests on the ability of the police to do just that. The Met is an organisation that, by virtue of its importance and size, attracts a lot of scrutiny. But like the New York Police Department in the early 1990s which had completely lost its way, the Met too often seems to have an overriding objective to avoid external criticism, not to fight crime. Scotland Yard has become an increasingly political place over the last decade; the senior management has established close relations with the media to defend their reputation. That is not the task of a police force.
 
It would be naive to expect the police to operate in a bubble. The Crime Reporters’ Association will still expect some privileged access, earned by their members’ own discretion and experience. And, of course, chief constables should maintain formal relations with the media and always have a direct line to the public in times of crisis. But close relations with buddies in the press is the preserve of politicians. So let those who are elected and accountable for politics judge them on that. But let the professionals, the chief constables, get on with fighting crime and disorder. Only police reform to create elected Police Commissioners can restore the police to their proper role.

Blair Gibbs is the Head of Crime & Justice at Policy Exchange

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in