Fraser Nelson Fraser Nelson

Osborne needs to make his case for growth

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

So the private sector is indeed taking up the slack. Not that you’d know this from what George Osborne says, because neither he nor anyone else in the government makes this very important point. As we know, government cannot “create” jobs. The best it can do is move jobs, from the private sector to the state sector. Every penny paid to a bureaucrat has to be earned by someone else — and withdrawing money from the real economy can only stunt the recovery in the real economy.

Osborne is, if anything, retreating on this agenda. The OBR actually forecasts that there will be 20,000 fewer public service job losses than it envisaged last November. In the new financial year, 2011-12, total state spending will fall by just 0.6 per cent. Osborne risks taking all of the political pain, and making none of the economic progress. Being Chancellor is about more than producing a budget once a year. It’s about making the argument for the government’s economic mission, explaining the concept of private sector job creation, and doing more than just saying “if I don’t cut, the bond markets will eat me alive”. As Chancellor, he needs to win the argument — and that means engaging with it more closely.

As far as I can make out, Bond’s point is that inflation — not cuts — is seriously threatening the recovery. That rising prices, and falling real wages, will hit consumer spending and also retailers’ margins. I agree, and fear that Osborne has been too slow to realise that a) Mervyn King has failed to control inflation, b) King’s constant plea that this just a blip is demonstrable nonsense, c) his inflation targeting record is, literally, the worst of any central bank in the world, and d) That King and the MPC are not going to solve inflation, contrary to their claims. Posen, bless him, is talking about a return to 1.5 per cent CPI. It’s a delusion. Their analytical framework has proven inadequate, as their constant failure over the last year shows. The Chancellor will have to step in: ultimately it’s his responsibility. It’s his recovery plan being ruined.

Inflation, not cuts, is the villain. Osborne had better start to make this case quickly — because the left will very quickly draw their own misleadingly simplistic conclusions.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in