Katy Balls
Already a subscriber? Log in
Did it need to end like this? Both critics and supporters of Paterson are unhappy with how this saga has played out. Had Paterson accepted the findings, the 30 day suspension period would have likely passed without any recall threats — or subsequent byelection — becoming a reality. The fact the government decided to fight it so publicly put Paterson in a very difficult position when they then changed course.
Reports that No. 10 did not even tell Paterson directly about the U-turn has landed badly with supporters of the MP. There is also a growing sense that No. 10 is losing its grip — instead, Downing Street is in panic mode after being surprised by the backlash.
While Paterson’s departure means that his case has come to an end, the government row over the issue is far from over. Senior Tories are unhappy with the handling of the whole affair by the Prime Minister, particularly his attempts to use Paterson’s case as a vehicle by which to replace the standards watchdog. Particular anger is being directed at chief whip Mark Spencer. The bruising debacle is leading once again to questions over the political operation in 10 Downing Street.
Because you read about boris johnson
Also by Katy Balls
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in