Mark Palmer

Planet of the canapés

Let’s get rid of these ridiculous thimble-sized offerings

[iStock]

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

‘And what do we have here?’ discerning guests asked politely, without waiting for the answer. ‘I won’t, thank you.’

I was famished and it would have been nice (but unacceptable, obviously) if I could have persuaded the waitresses to stand there for several minutes while I devoured seven or eight of all these little devils. As it was, I helped myself to just the one and off she went to torment other hungry imbibers. Foreplay is fine but there’s something to be said for penetration.

The canapé has become little more than a culinary affectation, an edible status symbol, and a good example of how those of us who normally subscribe to the less-is-more principle are sometimes wide of the mark.

Canapés serve a canny purpose, too, because the more savoury options on offer, the more people tend to drink, and at parties where the caterers or bar staff are counting the empty bottles with all the intensity of gold-diggers at the turn of the 19th century in Johannesburg, that’s important.

There’s an element of control in canapés. When the party is meant to be drawing to a close, out come the sweet options — usually a dollop of sugary custard on a tiny biscuit or a whole strawberry with chocolate smeared over the top.

The other day I was invited to Australia House for the premiere of Sir David Attenborough’s new series on the Great Barrier Reef. It was an inspiring occasion. Afterwards, there were drinks and meaningful conversations about ‘saving the planet’ — and then the canapés turned up to remind us of the unnatural world.

Some of them were in small bowls and came with their own forks, meaning that you either had to find a table on which to put down your champagne flute in order to eat what the chef had produced, or do without. One woman tried holding her glass in the nook of her arm while desperately trying to tuck into the mini risotto but it didn’t look comfortable.

My wife has an even stronger aversion to canapés than me. She can’t do with people talking with their mouths full or spluttering crumbs of food. And trying to master dipping sauces when wearing a pretty silk frock is a thankless task.

But there’s hope. My friend Shona, who cooks at numerous country weddings, says more and more couples are returning to trusty old staples such as salmon on brown bread (the quality of the salmon is crucial, apparently), sausages cooked in honey and sesame seeds and, hallelujah! vol au vents overflowing with chicken and ham.

Those cocktail sausages never fail and, somehow, I enjoy fishing out the sticks from my jacket pocket when I get home. The more sticks, the better the party.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in