Andrew Lambirth

Private passions | 23 October 2004

Already a subscriber? Log in

This article is for subscribers only

Subscribe today to get 3 months' delivery of the magazine, as well as online and app access, for only £3.

  • Weekly delivery of the magazine
  • Unlimited access to our website and app
  • Enjoy Spectator newsletters and podcasts
  • Explore our online archive, going back to 1828

Lovingly installed — though with perhaps a touch too much colour and brio — in the main galleries of the Academy are some 250 works acquired over half a century (from the late 1870s on) by a father and son, Carl and Helge Jacobsen, and subsequently presented to the Danish nation. They were talented collectors, and amassed one of the largest private collections of the time. They bought principally the ancient art of Egypt and Etruria, of Greece and Rome, Danish art of the Golden Age and contemporary painting and sculpture. Carl Jacobsen was more committed to sculpture, while his son brought the collection up to date by buying the kind of Impressionist and Post-Impressionist art his father was unable to appreciate. So, upon the conflict and confluence of different characters and passions, was a great collection built.

The visitor enters the exhibition via the Central Hall of the RA, which is bedecked with potted plants and a non-splashing bronze fountain by Antonin Mercie, depicting Honour to the Vanquished and commissioned by Carl Jacobsen himself. Then straight into a room of Danish Golden Age painting and sculpture, covering the period 1800–1850, with strange-looking nudes and rather fine and particular landscapes by Johan Thomas Lundbye, Christen Kobke and Martinus Rorbye — all new discoveries for me. Also some views of Rome by various classically minded travellers, and a very odd painting of the Aurora Borealis. In the gallery leading off this interesting introduction to the taste of the period, Egyptian antiquities are gathered, guarded by an imposing jackal-headed Anubis from the Temple of Luxor. There is a lovely, delicately incised limestone relief from the late 5th dynasty depicting a pastoral scene, and a case of small statuettes — a cat, a mongoose and the god Ptah, who apparently created the world by conceiving of the idea and then uttering the ‘creative word’.

There are so many wondrous things to see that it’s impossible to list them all, but the group of three stone heads, with the young Amenemhat III in the middle, is more than impressive, while the calcite hippo, dating back to about 3000 BC, has a splendid massivity and charm. Gallery 3 focuses on the theme of death in Rome, with facsimile frescoes done by Alessandro Colonelli in 1900 running along the top of one wall. Here, a heavy-headed male reclines atop a sarcophagus from the 2nd century BC, there a jug-eared funerary portrait relief in marble, or the four poignant terracotta statuettes of mourning women. Gallery 4 moves into the Greek sector of the collection, which also seems to me to be of high quality — Jacobsen obviously knew a great deal himself, but was evidently well-advised. Look at the ‘Torso of a wind goddess’, in Pentelic marble, from c.400 BC, or another hippo, this time in rosso antico marble. There are sliced limbs and emasculated nudes a-plenty, but the violence is curiously aestheticised, the expression fixed best in the drapery.

The RA’s main exhibiting hall, here known as Gallery 5, is tricked out in pale china blue, butter yellow and terracotta, and given over to a partial reconstruction of the sanctuary of Diana at Nemi, southeast of Rome. It’s a gallery of heads and busts and standing figures, which has not found favour with all critics — though how could one not admire the ‘Statue of Trajan in Armour’ or the stately figures of Polyhymnia, Melpomene and Erato? Or indeed the lovely statue of the ‘Laurentian Sow’? Admittedly, the long row of 16 heads, portraits from the Licinian Tomb in Rome, smacks perhaps of overkill (if such a pun be permitted), but that may be a fault of the installation, not of the sculpture.

After so much imperious glory, it is with a sense of anti-climax that one enters Gallery 8 (the stately progression of the exhibition slips badly out of sequence here) to be confronted by Rodin’s ‘Thinker’ in bronze and a couple of his unpleasantly slippery marbles. Although the walls are graced by Lautrec, Cézanne, Monet and Sisley, this is a disappointing gallery. The visitor, for the sake of chronology, is supposed to walk through this room (presumably with eyes glued to the floor) into Gallery 6. Certainly in there the high quality is maintained, the mood dominated by the magnificently brooding ‘Thunderstorm over Mont Blanc’ (1834) by Theodore Rousseau. There are some excellent plaster carvings by Carpeaux (continuing the exhibition’s running design of fruitfully mingling sculpture and painting), Manet’s famous picture of the cloaked absinthe drinker, a staggering David portrait, Courbets to moon over, and then a whole tiny gallery devoted to Degas.

This, Gallery 7, is a delightfully focused room of three paintings and 13 sculptures, with ‘Nude Study for the Little Ballet Dancer Aged 14 Years’ as its centrepiece. It is a room to return to, for silent contemplation. Exiting the show, back through Galleries 6 and 8, the last shock of this extraordinary collection is still to come — Gauguin in Gallery 9. It’s his carvings which immediately impress: the mahogany and plaster roundel of ‘La Chanteuse’ greets you at the entrance, its wonder re-inforced by a compelling group of decorative ceramics and the fascinating polychrome wood relief, ‘Woman with Mango Fruits’. The sculptures are backed up by good paintings, from the early angularity of ‘Skaters in Frederiksberg Park’ (1884) — reminding us that Gauguin not only had a Danish wife but also lived in Denmark for a couple of years — to the delicate and tender succulence of ‘Landscape near Pont-Aven, Brittany’ of 1888. Hung with sundry other things by the likes of Cézanne, Matisse and Picasso, the exhibition ends with a bang. It offers an astonishing range of work. ‘Probably the finest museum loan show in London’ — particularly if you say it in your most sonorous Orson Welles voice.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in