Already a subscriber? Log in
As evidence for their position, Mercier and Lepage point to the integrity of the overall design of the complex as well as to a certain consistency in the motifs and decorative detail. They also calculate that in terms of man-hours and cubic metres of extraction, the churches could have been completed in a couple of decades — a lot quicker, in fact, than building them.
One of the more contentious debates about Lalibela has been the part played — if any — by foreigners. Were Copts involved, or Arabs or Byzantines, Armenians or Indians? Or even the Knights Templar? Ethiopians have always been a little miffed at the assumption that nothing so wondrous could have been achieved by their own ancestors. Recent studies have, in the main, focused on a more indigenous provenance. The discovery of other, smaller-scale rock-hewn churches in the north of Ethiopia has helped. Mercier and Lepage back up the home-grown origins by stressing the ambition and power of King Lalibela.
Anyone visiting Lalibela is struck by the names of the sites — here is Golgotha and the Mount of Olives, Mount Sinai, the River Jordan, a mound in one of the courtyards is Mount Ararat. The inevitable interpretation is that it was all intended as a reconstruction, a kind of biblical model village. That Jerusalem had just fallen to Saladin at the time of King Lalibela — denying Ethiopians the chance of pilgrimage — appears to back this up. But Mercier and Lepage doubt that King Lalibela had really intended a replacement Jerusalem; nor do they give much credence to the suggestion that the churches represent the early Christian centre of Edessa: the site’s original name was Roha, the local name for Edessa.
The authors have each studied Lalibela — and in particular the decorative motifs, the church treasures and the iconography — in meticulous detail. The arguments they develop are broadly based and generally robust. What is given less space in their study is a sense of the fluid way that the place is perceived. Lalibela is a living pilgrimage site. Tens of thousands of Ethiopians trek there every year, as they have for centuries, bringing with them a host of expectations and narratives. Priests perform exorcisms, miracle cures take place; many pilgrims go to Lalibela simply to die.
Layer upon layer of associations have built up, clogging the aisles and the trenches with mythology. Ethiopian belief is famously ambiguous. Try to pin down what something represents and you are left with paradoxes — which makes the literal questions about Lalibela — the when, who, why — not only harder to answer but somehow less relevant.
Yet Mercier’s and Lepage’s Lalibela remains a book wholly worthy of its subject. The achievement of the churches, the complexity of their sculpted architecture, the meanings and influences of the decoration and artefacts can all be gleaned from its beautifully produced pages. If the photographs themselves lack a little of the mystery of Georg Gerster’s in Churches in Rock (1971), the probing scholarship and the sheer range of objects and surfaces studied make the impact and wonder of this book second only to heading up into the Ethiopian mountains to see the place for yourself.
Also in Book Reviews
Also by Philip Marsden
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in