Already a subscriber? Log in
Also in this densely hung first room are the rampantly decorative ‘Portrait of Margherita Paleologo’ (c.1531) by Giulio Romano, the black and gold overdress forming a splendid linear patterning which is the painting’s chief virtue, and Parmigianino’s possibly incomplete ‘Portrait of a Young Nobleman’ (c.1530â“2), though the face certainly has a wonderfully refined translucent finish. To the right on the end wall is Vasari’s copy after Michelangelo and Pontormo of ‘Venus and Cupid’ (c.1543), both participants looking pretty furious at having to kiss in public. The painting was acquired by Queen Caroline on behalf of her somewhat philistine husband George II. He was not impressed, and referred to the principal’s rather bulky charms as the ‘gigantic fat Venus’.
On the adjoining wall is a very different kind of picture and one of the great treats of the exhibition: Giovanni Bellini’s ‘Portrait of a Young Man’ (c.1505), his last surviving portrait and the only one to have a landscape background. The subtly painted sitter could be Pietro Bembo, the Venetian writer and humanist, who casts a cold eye on the world beyond his luminous fastness. A memorable portrait in quite another, more earthy style, by Leandro Bassano, Jacopo’s third son, hangs with a Titian. Nearby, the luxurious if excessive moustaches of a bearded man by Lorenzo Lotto make a fitting counterpoint to his superbly pleated doublet, rendered with almost hallucinatory realism.
The adjacent gallery is devoted to drawings, and there are far too many worthwhile exhibits here to be listed. I recommend spending time with a dozen or so images, among which might be Leonardo’s ‘Neptune’ (c.1504), all movement in suspension and a hundred times better than what the Futurists did 500 years later; Baccio Bandinelli’s sculptural cross-hatching in ‘A Head of a Man’ (c.1545); Michelangelo’s staggering tour de force of red chalk drawing, ‘A Children’s Bacchanal’ (1533); Raphael’s vigorous ‘Conversion of the Proconsul’ (c.1514), in metalpoint and brown wash; Agostino Carracci’s speedy and superb pen drawing ‘The Adoration of the Shepherds’ (c.1592â“4), so vivid among so many worthy but less interesting studies; Poussin’s ‘Saving of the Infant Pyrrhus’ (c.1633â“4); Annibale Carracci’s fine ‘Polyphemus’ (c.1597â“8) in black chalk; the back of a male nude (c.1630) in red chalk by Gian Lorenzo Bernini, and his black chalk fountain design. I also liked Borromini’s drawing of a column twisting sensuously like a human body. In the small room off, look out for the monotype (c.1655) by Castiglione, who invented the process, and a tremendous Guercino reclining figure (c.1618â“19). So much to see and take in…
Returning to the painting galleries, there’s a small room of 12 oil-on-copper panels of Cupid and Psyche by Luca Giordano, rather like 17th-century kiss-and-tell journalism, before the last, beautifully top-lit gallery. Here are two paintings recently reattributed to Caravaggio. The slight awkwardness of ‘A Boy Peeling Fruit’ in the forced diagonal between his elbows may be explained if this is indeed Caravaggio’s earliest surviving painting. Of more interest to me were the big dramatic Tintoretto ‘Esther before Ahasuerus’ (c.1546â“7), the extraordinary attempted seduction scene ‘Joseph and Potiphar’s Wife’ (c.1630â“2) by Orazio Gentileschi, and over to its right the marvellous self-portrait by Orazio’s daughter, Artemisia, long a favourite of mine. Another Tintoretto is hung on the end wall, a masterly and strongly modelled figure composition of the Muses: note the almost electric way the drapery has been touched in.
By contrast, there’s an utterly compelling informal portrait ‘Head of a Man in Profile’ (c.1588â“95) by Annibale Carracci. In handling, it has some of the modernity (or timelessness) of Manet, a directness more often to be found in the Carraccis’ drawings than in their paintings. Next to it is a complex but beguiling allegory also by Annibale which displays an astonishing tenderness in the figure painting. On your way out, don’t miss a separate and specially climate-controlled gallery containing decorative panels by Federico Zuccaro, Polidoro da Caravaggio and Giulio Romano. The last may be dreadful (though I know someone in the art world who looks just like his Emperor Vespasian on horseback), but he must once have been popular. Charles I had Romano’s panels in his private apartments, and he is the only artist to be mentioned in Shakespeare.
Unusually, because designed for the public’s convenience, there are two varieties of catalogue accompanying the show. There is a compact, squarish paperback (published by Scala at £9.95) with 140 colour reproductions and a text which is abridged from the larger publication. And then there is the grand hardback, which illustrates every exhibit and offers at least a page of commentary on each. This is a proper catalogue, which rather puts to shame the ‘book of the exhibition’ publicat ions so beloved of museums nowadays, too often containing long unreadable essays by academics frantic to promote their careers. This magnificent tome by Lucy Whitaker and Martin Clayton, with contributions by Aislinn Loconte, has a short contextual introduction and then concentrates, as a catalogue should, on the individual exhibits. The entries are clearly written and informative, with a wealth of comparative illustrations. Even priced at £45 this book would be a decided addition to any art lover’s library.
Also in Arts Reviews
Also by Andrew Lambirth
Latest
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in